Behavior OnLine GENERAL DISCUSSION FORUM ARCHIVE
     
    Return to the active forum

    Even biological science shakes its head in disgust
    psychneuro@aol.com · 09/05/00 at 11:51 ET

    Powerful message. Deeply moving.

    The trend is particularly disturbing for the clients, but
    it is also disturbing even from a research perspective.

    As the biological science moves inexorably toward the
    increasingly evolutionary-genetic view of human behavior,
    we also have the frightening side-effect that we become
    more accepting in general of purely biological fixes as
    well. I'm not equating Torrey with Dr. Faustius, but he does exemplify the lack of simple scientific
    humility that is called for when we deal with complex behavior and the full human experience.

    Given that pharmacological fixes are more convenient and drive a great deal of
    positive economic flow in large industries, the sad move toward a more exclusively
    medical-neurological model is hard to stop, just because it happens to be based on
    scientific misunderstandings. These include simplistic determinism (which I doubt
    even Torrey believes in except when forced into debate) being confused with modern
    interactionism, and gene-protein-behavior links specific
    to drug effects assumed to somehow manage to negate the ones responsible for the evolved capacity for self-control and even the fundamental self-regulation found
    in all living organisms.

    The "gene for" and "neurotransmitter for" and "brain region for" rhetoric that makes
    so much sense in driving research to investigate the sources of human variation ...
    and it really does ... also inadvertently helps fuel the existing industries of social
    control. By putting on blinders and focusing on specific causal chains to the exclusion
    of others. That's shown clearly by the fact that huge areas of human behavioral and
    experiential variation are not accounted for by factors that can yet be fixed by
    developing or prescribing drugs. And it is obvious that overall our use of drugs
    has currently gone way beyond our diagnostic capacity for actually fitting drugs
    to putative syndromes, and has taken away significantly from our humanity in helping
    people in distress.

    The question is whether our answer lies in developing better medical treatments,
    refining our use of drugs, to better align with the mythical worldview of simplistic
    chemical determinism (the "chemical imbalance") or by expanding our view of the causes
    of human distress to something closer to the actual modern biological model.

    Replies:
    • Re:Even biological science shakes its head in disgust, by Monica, 09/05/00
      • Re:Even biological science shakes its head in disgust, by psychneuro@aol.com, 09/06/00
        • Re:Even biological science shakes its head in disgust, by George O, 09/07/00
          • Re:Even biological science shakes its head in disgust, by MOnica, 09/11/00

    Reply Index Next Previous Help



    | Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |

    Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.