First, while evolution itself is apparently a fact the Second, it would be very nice to separate science from For example, current questions seem focused on the issue Third, we would have to ask what are the motives in Of course there is,regardless of preference, the issue
way gravity is, the mechanics of evolution are under great
debate with no proven conclusion, last I knew. Of course
the debates are sources of much fruitful thought and must
be done, but it seems rather risky, when people's welfare
is at stake, to base a shaky thought on another shaky thought.
politics and culture in general,but it's not possible. Politics and culture determine what questions we ask of science, and science is geared towards answering those
questions.
if homosexuality is right or wrong. We aren't getting a
discussion on this website if masturbation or manufactured
forms of birth-control are right or wrong, yet these practices inhibit population growth. (Of course, if this
website were the property of certain religious denominations, I guess we woould be reading that the practices were against God. But in some ways, evolution for
some people seems to have become a disguised form of Divine
Purpose, just as the idea of dysfunction contaminating everyone in a family seems at times a disguised form of
original sin.)
framing these questions. Apparently if we see homosexuality
as biologically caused, we can't "blame" homosexuals and we
can't "change" them, but, if the preference is psychological, we get to blame them and it is considered
legitimate to try to change them. To ask a radical question,
why not just let people be who they are, as happily as they
can be?
of people hurting each other, sometimes deliberately, sometimes in confusion. The issue of cutting down the amount of pain seems a fruitful topic to pursue.
Replies:
|
| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |
Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.