��as I see things, removing the mystery from an overwhelmingly powerful experience does not make the experience any less meaningful.�
Penrose notes that there are certain classes of well-defined mathematical problems that can�t be solved algorithmically/computationally, but that nevertheless are often solved by humans. He notes �mathematicians are not using a knowably sound algorithm to ascertain mathematical truth�; and that �understanding� is a �non-algorithmic activity,� as are things like awareness, imagination, insight. (Shadows of The Mind )
So anyway, here�s my advice:
1. Don�t listen to JimB or Todd.
2. Your belief that you�ve removed the mystery is delusional. Drop it.
3. If the woman doesn�t share your reductionist mechanistic views, for god�s sake, keep your f�king mouth shut�she�s a gift.
4. Realize that you�re not going to follow any of this advice and that you�ll likely f�k things up; so mentally prepare for the big hurt. When the relationship starts to go south, the hurt you�ll experience s/b worse than what I�ll experience if/when my liver does the same; so I�ll take this opportunity to offer my friendly concern and best wishes to you too.
Replies:
![]() |
| Behavior OnLine Home Page | Disclaimer |
Copyright © 1996-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.