Cape Cod Institute
 
Behavior OnLine Forums  
The gathering place for Mental Health and
Applied Behavior Science Professionals.
 
Become a charter member of Behavior OnLine.

Go Back   Behavior OnLine Forums > BOL Forums > Ericksonian Therapy

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread January 3rd, 2005, 01:43 AM
Scott Shimabukuro Scott Shimabukuro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Default Erickson and submodalities

I recently read that Bandler got the idea of submodalities from Erickson when he observed Dr. Erickson asking the psychologist (who had referred a patient) how he knew which pictures in his thoughts were of actual events and which were imagined. The psychologist responded that the real events were represented in squares in his mind. He then asked the referred patient, who was having difficulty distinguishing between reality and fantasy, to put certain images into squares and apparently had resolved some of her psychosis in this manner. I've never come across this story of Erickson using submodalities in this manner (or similar stories) outside of the NLP literature and wondered if it existed somewhere else. It seems like such a significant contribution. A reference would be great.

Last edited by Stephen Lankton; January 10th, 2005 at 11:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread January 4th, 2005, 01:06 AM
Stephen Lankton Stephen Lankton is offline
Forum Leader
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 117
Default Re: Erickson and submodalities

Yes, I too have never heard it.

Odd that those of us who saw Erickson off and on for years never heard or published that story.

Last edited by Stephen Lankton; September 18th, 2005 at 09:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread September 6th, 2005, 01:59 AM
michaelj michaelj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1
Default Re: Erickson and submodalities

Hi Stephen,

John Grinder stated on his forum that he had seen Milton much more than 4 days, just for interest sake.

Scott, I have heard bandler tell that story too. To me, it had nothing to do with Milton understanding submodalities. Milton just did his usual superb job of help someone with a problem do things like someone who didn't have the problem. My understanding of that Bandler story was that it stimulated Bandlers thinking to investigate submodalities, rather than Erickson having an explicit (or even unconscious) understanding of them.

Also, I might point out that Bandlers story was also used metaphorically.

All the best,

Michael
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995-2004 Behavior OnLine, Inc. All rights reserved.