View Single Post
Unread August 23rd, 2004, 12:41 PM
travistee travistee is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5
Cool Re: Abuse of counseling by sherrif

You did bring up some helpful ideas.

The heart of the matter is having to admit you are in denial about something that has not become a legal fact.

If you get a dui, beat up your wife and get convicted of it then it is a legal fact, and it makes sense that you would have to admit you are in denial.

My question is about a case where there is no legal finding by the court that has to be admitted to. Only the "medical?" finding by a sheriffs dept phychologist.

So why should she have to agree with the psychologist when the judge has agreed that the court does not have to believe the allegations.
Reply With Quote