CHAT TRANSCRIPT - Oct. 24, 1999

15:17:04JohnSuler-mOK EVERYONE.... LET'S BEGIN
15:17:18JohnSuler-mBEHAVIOR ONLINE WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME YOU TO THIS PANEL DISCUSSION ON HEALTHY AND PATHOLOGICAL INTERNET USE.....THANK YOU FOR COMING!
15:17:37JohnSuler-mOUR PANELISTS INCLUDE MICHAEL FENICHEL, STORM KING, STEVEN STERN, AND KIMBERLY YOUNG..... with me as the moderator. A "p" appears after the name of each panelist. David Greenberg, who was originally scheduled as a panelist, hopes to be able to join us late
15:18:01JohnSuler-mYou can read about the panelists' work and backgrounds in the program for this meeting, which is located at http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/bolchatpath.html (you should be able to click on that url and it will activate your browser)
15:18:20JohnSuler-mDuring the panel discussion, please refrain from sending public messages. You are welcome to "whisper" (send private messages) to other attenders, but keep in mind that if you whisper to someone, the chat program places a series of dots next to your name.
15:18:43JohnSuler-mPlease also refrain from sending private messages to the panelists. They will have their hands full with typing!
15:19:08JohnSuler-mAFTER THE PANEL DISCUSSION, WHEN I OPEN UP THE MEETING TO QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE, INDICATE THAT YOU WANT TO SPEAK BY TYPING THE MESSAGE "HAND." WE'LL TAKE THE QUESTIONS/COMMENTS IN ORDER.
15:19:34JohnSuler-m(since the group is not too large, we may dispense with that hand raising procedure at some point
15:19:51JohnSuler-mWithin a few days, a TRANSCRIPT of this meeting will be placed online at /chatevents/index.html
15:20:22JohnSuler-mOK panelists.... let's start... usually I begin these meetings with a question but...
15:20:39JohnSuler-mwhat do you think is a good question about healthy versus pathological internet use?
15:21:46KimberlyYoung-pA good starter question might be how to differentiate normal from compulsive use of the Internet?
15:22:37JohnSuler-mgood kimberly... how do we tell the difference between the two?
15:24:07Stormyes. a definition would be a good starting point. I wanted to propose the term Internet enabled pathology and then think about net addiction as a type of that. (in terms of clarifying what it is we are tying to define)
15:24:23KimberlyYoung-pIMHO, I have utilize modified criteria from the DSM-IV for Pathological Gambling as a model to examine compulsive use of the Internet, but I would also like to hear what other panelists believe as well...didn't mean to answer my own question :-)
15:24:38Dr-Mike-pI often site your notion of *integrating* online and offline life, but also inevitably think about *extent* of each. I agree with Kimberly's focus on compulsion, too. Quality vs Quantity of relationships online? (Gee, I think I'm surrounded by compulsive whisperers!)
15:25:51JohnSuler-mis compulsiveness a feature of all internet enabled pathology?
15:26:35Dr-Mike-pI don't think one is by necessity being compulsive. Some may feel empty or "bored".
15:27:00Stormyes - compulsiveness would be a factor I would think, for most forms of it
15:27:45KimberlyYoung-pI think compulsiveness, in light of the DSM-IV criteria, focuses on behavior
15:27:49Steven-Stern--PCompulsiveness and boredom cause all sorts of symptoms--I think of internet overuse as just one of many possible symptoms
15:28:59KimberlyYoung-pBut what I find it the reasons for compulsive use of the Internet tend to vary dependent upon the types of applications one is compulsive about and the underlying motivations for compulsive use
15:29:24JohnSuler-mwhat are those underlying motivations?
15:29:32StormSo - what does anyone think it is about the net that is uniquely a sources of pathology?
15:30:03KimberlyYoung-pFor example, one person might be "addicted" to chat rooms, another person to cyberporn, and yet another person to online auction houses
15:30:08Dr-Mike-pI don't disagree that much "pathological" use has become compulsive, a la DSM-IV. And I too see the prevalence of Internet-enabled addictionS (shopping, gambling, etc) which may, as John suggests, have something underlying them which is similar. I think the net facilitates this.
15:30:15Steven-Stern--PI would argue that the net makes compulsive behavior easier due to the anonymity
15:30:35KimberlyYoung-pThe Internet being such a diverse set of applications I think leads to subtypes of the pathology
15:30:51Dr-Mike-p...and ease of access and reinforcement...
15:31:13Steven-Stern--PI strongly agree with Kimberly's last assertion--so Is net addiction a single disorder?
15:31:14JOINmille has joined.
15:31:20JohnSuler-mAn underlying question is whether the internet CAUSES these pathological behavior, or is it a catalyst that activates pre-existing pathology
15:31:22JOING-Novitsky has joined.
15:31:43Dr-Mike-pIs the net a single thing? :-)
15:32:19Steven-Stern--PI strongly believe that many things in our environment are catalysts, the net being one of them
15:32:48StormDoes a slot machine CAUSE pathological gambling? No - it enables it for some people who find that from of reinforcement to much to handel
15:33:33Dr-Mike-p(sorry about the double--"enter" acts like "send" I've discovered) Exactly Storm. In "addiction" terms, I see the net's easy pickings as a "facilitator".
15:33:40KimberlyYoung-pCause and effect is rather difficult to determine, perhaps we need to examine the reasons for addictive and compulsive behavior in general to better understand how to examine that question in terms of the Internet
15:33:54JohnSuler-mwhat is the worse case of internet addiction that you people have seen?
15:35:31Dr-Mike-pI yield to Kimberly, whose stories are legion. But only this week I got a call from a woman whose husband locks himself in the room, has stopped going to work, and now run off to "clear his head".
15:35:36StormThe worst I've heard of may be the reports of the lady that lost 70,000$ to an online casino.
15:36:15KimberlyYoung-pWhile a good questions, I find it difficult to talk about a worst case as for each person who suffers from the problem, the individuals feels helpless and out of control but I will say that one in particular was very disturbing...
15:37:09KimberlyYoung-pA 12-year old took his mother's life and then his own after his mother had taken away the computer
15:37:43Stormouch!
15:37:50KimberlyYoung-pIn brief, he had continued to use the Internet against his mother's wishes, this went on for several months and she finally dismantled the computer
15:38:12JohnSuler-mhow tragic, Kimberly
15:38:27KimberlyYoung-phe noted his depression and agitation growing and was in the middle of trying to find counseling to help her son when he took a gun the mother kept in the home for protection and used it
15:38:44Dr-Mike-pGee, I've not seen anything so severe (except Columbine HS's web page), but I do have teen clients who stay up all night playing games and bomb out of school, and get into horrible fights with their families.
15:38:51KimberlyYoung-pleft a suicide note that indicated that she was responsible for taking away his entire world
15:39:09JohnSuler-mwhat was he doing online, Kimberly?
15:39:12KimberlyYoung-phe police contacted me about this, it was perhaps the most disturbing thing I had heard
15:39:27KimberlyYoung-pthat is when the police contacted me
15:39:36KimberlyYoung-phe was using chat rooms mostly
15:40:30KimberlyYoung-pI don't mean to sensationalize this tragedy nor blame the Internet, but I think that it points to how subjective the experience can become
15:40:41JohnSuler-mone sign of addiction is the narrowing of the person's life to the addictive element, with anything else being seen as a distraction or obstacle to the addictive substance... this sounds like a perfect example of that
15:40:51Dr-Mike-pBtw, I feel obliged to point out that with Columbine HS, etc. almost always it is that agitation/depression/suicidality which leads to acting out in a grand way to take out others! (Not necessarily Internet-related!)
15:41:01KimberlyYoung-pand how intense the feelings are in relation to Internet use and online relationships (with the assumption that was this boy's entire world and focus)
15:42:07StormI believe we have 2 cases. One - disturbed people (like this child) and people with addictive tendencies who find the net and then use it to play out an existing, underlying pathology. Two - is the person who has not pre-existing pathology but for whom the use of the net is so highly reinforcing (due to it's unique reinforcement value) that they become pathological in their net use.
15:42:25JohnSuler-mlet's go back to a question that someone raised earlier... is there anything UNIQUE about the internet that makes it addictive?
15:43:02JOINDanielle has joined.
15:43:21Steven-Stern--PThe internet makes it possible to do things that were previously unavailable to many (gambling) or embarrassing (porn consumption)
15:43:24Dr-Mike-pVariable reinforcement? Constant availability 24/7? The nice warm glow of the monitor-mother?
15:43:33JohnSuler-ma good issue Storm... if someone without obvious pre-existing pathology gets overly involved in the internet, is this an addiction? Did the internet cause it?
15:43:49StormYes. The net is unique in the ability to be anonymous and it the social norm online that lets people interact with "strangers."
15:44:38Dr-Mike-pNot unlike CB radio (for adolescent boys, at least)-- there's power and anonymity, together.
15:44:47KimberlyYoung-pWell, in the prior discussion here, it seems that anonymity, direct reinforcement coupled with immediate gratification, accessibility to what has previously been difficult to obtain (e.g., graphic pornography) all may be elements about Internet use that are addictive properties
15:44:54Steven-Stern--PWhat is the benefit of grouping all compulsive behaviors that people exhibit over the internet as a single disorder?
15:45:29JohnSuler-mas Kimberly is suggesting.. it's interesting that there is a difference between the subjective and objective indices of being addicted
15:46:04StormYes. Kimberly has listed the UNIQUE qualities of the net that some people find hard to resist
15:46:19JohnSuler-mSteven... how would you categorize the different types of internet addiction?
15:47:01Steven-Stern--PActually, I don't actually believe there is "Internet addiction"
15:47:39JohnSuler-mGo ahead with that, Steven... please explain
15:47:49Steven-Stern--PThere are many behaviors that become easier over the internet, but I see no reason to categorize them by a new and potentially non-permanent technology
15:47:50Dr-Mike-pSomebody at APA-Boston (maybe Steven, or David?) made the point about Internet AddictionS being plural, a point I've embraced. And Kimberly, even your own description of addiction to THE net describes all the different components. I like your tendency to focus on the "gambling"-like (reinforcement based) compulsive qualities, rather than the neuro-physical-substance approach.
15:47:51StormOk Steve - what do you believe is causing the reports of failed lives?
15:48:07KimberlyYoung-pTo address Steven's question, I am not sure it has been recognized as a "single" disorder but I think the concept of compulsive, pathological, or addictive use of the Internet serves as an umbrella term to describe a type of behavior pattern
15:48:21Steven-Stern--PPeople have failed their lives over many, many things before the internet came along
15:49:44Steven-Stern--PTechnologies are fleeting---as a scientist, I am worried that we are organizing our field around something that may not even exist after a while
15:50:21KimberlyYoung-pthank you Dr. Mike, I have found that models for process addictions or behavioral addictions are useful in understanding the maladaptive behavior related to the Internet
15:50:29StormThis is an organized field? :-)
15:50:57JohnSuler-mis part of the problem that the concepts of "addiction" are themselves very elusive and complex? and "compulsions"
15:51:50StormAs a friend of mine said - yes...lifes can fail and often it is caused by addictions...or at least inability to focus
15:51:56Dr-Mike-pSteven- maybe that's why sociology/psych etc are viewed as "soft-sciences"? They're malleable and illusive at times. Organized, Storm? Hah! And you're welcome, Kimberly, I've also assimilated many concepts from your presentations, as well as Storm's and others'.
15:51:56Dr-Mike-pSteven- maybe that's why sociology/psych etc are viewed as "soft-sciences"? They're malleable and illusive at times. Organized, Storm? Hah! And you're welcome, Kimberly, I've also assimilated many concepts from your presentations, as well as Storm's and others'.
15:52:08KimberlyYoung-pJohn, you make an excellent point, I think the addiction field has long had trouble reaching agreement, which makes the complexity of understanding this concept more difficult
15:52:20Dr-Mike-pOops! How'd I do that? (Twice) sorry...
15:53:13StormWhy is pathological gambling recognized as a separate pathology within the impulse control disorders? the internet has a reinforcement qualities similar to a slot machine.
15:53:16JohnSuler-mif we step back for a moment.. what do we make out of this whole debate about "internet addiction"... is there something to learn from that?
15:53:47Steven-Stern--PStorm--people gambled for centuries before slot machines were invented as well
15:54:42Dr-Mike-pI think one reasonable conclusion is that the easy one-size-fits-all label is easy to make into a pop-phenomenon. But as Storm says, there's probably at least 2 sizes.
15:54:49KimberlyYoung-pInteresting point, Storm...I am not sure I have an answer as to why it is signed out
15:55:02StormSteve - you are evading my question. If gambling, why not the net too?
15:55:26Steven-Stern--Pgambling is a behavior, the internet is an object
15:56:21StormPardon me?
15:56:35Dr-Mike-pI think blackjack or Caveman "go fish" (or pterodactyl) was on a VR schedule, too. My own paper on "internet addiction" focuses on the combination of reinforcement and instant gratification. Then too are the aspects of what one "escapes".
15:56:37StormIt is the behavior of the use of the net that is the topic here
15:57:12JohnSuler-mOK. LET'S OPEN UP THE MEETING TO QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE. INDICATE THAT YOU WANT TO SPEAK BY TYPING THE MESSAGE "HAND." WE'LL TAKE THE QUESTIONS/COMMENTS IN ORDER.
15:57:26Steven-Stern--PStorm--I would argue that we should focus on the behavior--call a gambling addiction a gambling addiction whether it is in a casino row on casino.com
15:57:27G-Novitskyhand
15:57:59JohnSuler-mOK G-Novitsky...go ahead
15:58:08JOINGil-Levin has joined.
15:58:28G-NovitskyYes--my first comment is about just that point, Dr. Stern...
15:58:31SteveBiggsHAND: I'm surprised that no one is drawing any comparisons between Internet over use and the classic multimedia pathology, televistelefunkenion, Especially with a 100+ channels on cable and remote control. I imagine more people are wasting more time at home with this medium than with the Internet.
15:58:38G-Novitskysorry
15:59:12G-NovitskyWhy are we even calling this ONE or even TWO addictions...
15:59:38G-Novitskywhen we have actually got a situation where we the net facilitates many...
15:59:43StormSteve - I kind of agree with you, but, casino.com is a far different deal that Las Vegas. That difference is what makes the net pathological for some in ways that would not otherwise exist - hence Internet enabled pathology as a valid field of study.
16:00:05G-Novitskye.g., sexual addictions of various types, gambling addictions, etc.
16:00:08Dr-Mike-pThe September APA American Psychologist has a series of Comments by and about the Carnegie-Mellon team which posited a great deal of subtlety between online behavior and the "real world" as it exists now (which is increasingly online!). And point taken.... First was "radio addiction", then telephone, tv, and now something new.... maybe we're discussing "technology addiction" or "entertainment addiction" or "communication addiction" as well. (I'm a self-professed "news addict")
16:00:23Daniellehand
16:00:33JohnGroholhand
16:00:47Steven-Stern--PStorm-Internet enabled sounds better to me than internet addiction, but I'm not sure as a diagnosis of any theoretical substance
16:00:49G-NovitskyDo we judge addiction by the venue in which the behavior is carried out, or by the focus of the addictive behavior?
16:01:19Marlenehand
16:01:31StormG-Novitsky - we do both.
16:01:40AzyHAND
16:01:44Steven-Stern--PI think we should regain our focus on the addictive behavior
16:02:30JohnSuler-mDANIELLE, go ahead with your question
16:02:36G-NovitskyStorm-are we saying, You are a casino-gambling-addict, or You are an online-casino-gambling addict?
16:03:10Dr-Mike-pI just became confused for a moment, so went back to check: The title of this presentation is: Healthy and Pathological Internet Use
16:04:16DanielleAs a researcher of addictions, It is apparent to me that when behavior interferes with interpersonal functioning than that is problem behavior...no matter what the medium it gets channeled by..?
16:05:35StormYes - a clinically significant impairment in functioning
16:06:05JOINKimberlyYoung-P has joined.
16:06:18Dr-Mike-pI agree completely with Danielle. I don't think humans are pre-wired to relate to the Internet differently than their favorite slot machine, drug, or compulsive activity offline!
16:06:23JohnSuler-mIs there any pathological behavior that doesn't interfere with interpersonal functioning....hm... gonna have to think about that
16:06:34KimberlyYoung-PSorry, having web trouble here and unable to send the last few messages
16:07:15Steven-Stern--PDr.Mike--I still think we need to organize our field by addictive things and things that help deliver them to us. We oughtn't mix the two
16:07:17SteveBiggsHAND
16:07:23JohnSuler-mJOHN... go ahead with your question
16:07:27JohnGroholI think what we're seeing here is not an addiction, but an acclimation behavior. People take time to get acclimated to new things in their lives. Whether it's TV, a telephone, whatever... until/unless someone tracks these behaviors over time, and uses an actual *control group*, we'll simply never know. And I agree with Steven Stern... Call porn addiction, porn addiction, no matter what the modality. Call gambling, gambling, online or off.
16:07:45KimberlyYoung-PProcess models for addiction focus on maladaptive behavior
16:08:22KimberlyYoung-PIn that context, perhaps we need to evaluate Internet behavior as we do behavior surrounding gambling, sexuality, and eating
16:08:37StormI think Mike and Danielle are on the right track here - pathological use of anything is important to look at, and the net has identifiable aspects that are very different from previous technologies
16:09:06JohnSuler-mOK... FREE FOR ALL... OPEN DISCUSSION!!
16:09:21Azysomehow the discussion here focused on internet addiction(s) as a sole pathological use of the Net. What I usually see are OTHER, less severe pathologies, such as permanently harassing people in chat rooms, or permanently using dirty language (to draw attention?). These, in my mind, are more serious pathologies than Internet addictive behaviors! I'd like to know why the panel elected to concentrate mainly on Internet addiction?
16:09:23MarleneI think we need to take a look at the reinforcement our culture provides for "maladaptive behavior"
16:09:52JohnGroholGood point Azy.
16:10:07JohnSuler-mgood point, Azy.... we need more time
16:10:32JohnSuler-mFrom what I know of people who act out like that online, they often are using the internet excessively
16:10:50JOINAntonio has joined.
16:11:02Dr-Mike-pWell, factoring in John G's point about acclimation and lack of control groups, it's awful tough to separate out the variance of Internet-enabled versus other forms of compulsive behavior. A thing about Internet as opposed to tv and radio (but consistent with the telephone and slot machine) is that it is interactive and multi-sensory.
16:11:10KimberlyYoung-PYes, Good point Azy, there are a variety of issues to discuss and not enough time
16:11:15Steven-Stern--PJohn--it seems it would be hard to separate the two--the more you use the net, the more you have time to misbehave
16:11:17AzyI'm not really sure of that, John. Some people behave so only when anonymous!
16:11:21JohnGroholI think we see that the Internet is a very enabling technology. It enables great things (like online support groups) and negative things (like maladaptive behaviors). Just as the telephone brought great distances together, the Internet is bringing people together even more, for better and for worse.
16:11:21JohnSuler-mi.e... I think there's a significant overlap between excessive internet use and acting out online
16:11:24DanielleI agree with Storm and Marlene...That is imperative that we continue to research the problems that are actually occurring online...people are getting into and exacerbating problem behaviors online
16:11:25StormJohn G. - is it not easy to see that net enabled gambling addiction is very different from f2f gambling addiction, and deserving of it's own classification? think about the ease of access issue.
16:11:56SteveBiggsCan anyone really operationalize the criteria for pathological internet use? Is it any different than say pathological phone use? And, has anyone successfully billed a third party payer for treating IAD?
16:12:33MarleneI think you can, Steve...but not with the current DSM nosology...
16:12:34KimberlyYoung-PPerhaps there are several debates here - one clearly seems academic and the other the clinical implications of this problem
16:12:46stephanieI'm looking for psychological articles about online therapy/counseling - can anyone help?
16:12:54JohnGroholStorm... I know of gamblers who have picked up and moved to Atlantic City or Las Vegas to be closer to their addiction. With the advent of riverboat gambling, Indian reservation gambling, and lotteries, I don't think access is much of an issue any longer.
16:13:10JohnSuler-mspeaking for myself.... I don't use DSM categories much, so I don't think in those terms
16:13:14KimberlyYoung-PIn treatment settings, typically Impulse-control disorder NOS or OCD are utilized for third party payment in these cases
16:13:51Azystephanie, there are quite a few now...
16:13:52JohnSuler-mI think in terms of personality styles and developmental levels of functioning
16:14:14JohnSuler-mso understanding internet addiction works on a case by case level
16:14:31SteveBiggsI'm not really talking about DSM Nosology, but good psychological practice clearly defining a variable so that we can discriminate it from others.
16:14:38Dr-Mike-pI agree with Kimberly... there are an abundance of interesting and ripe areas for exploration...both academic *and* clinical! And Stephanie, there are resources on the ISMHO web site, for a start, www.ismho.org
16:15:04DanielleJohn...Do you think there is an addictive personality type?
16:15:54stephaniethanks a lot
16:15:59Azyresearch shows that there is no addictive personality type ACROSS DIFFERENT ADDICTIONS
16:16:02JohnSuler-ma very good question... the answer, I think, is yes
16:16:23JohnSuler-mbut the dynamics vary according to developmental levels of functioning
16:16:48DanielleThank you I agree
16:16:55JohnSuler-mon the neurotic level, it is a repetition compulsion, as Freud described
16:17:08KimberlyYoung-PTo operationalize pathological use of the Internet, I developed eight criteria based upon the modified DSM-IV criteria for Pathological Gambling, typically included in my articles, some of the items include concealing the behavior, using the Internet to escape, continued use despite the consequences, inability to stop or control the behavior
16:17:19MarleneOne thing we have not identified, yet is a model of healthy internet usage...
16:17:31Dr-Mike-pAzy, a porno addict may not be addicted to heroine or StarTrek chat rooms to be sure, but there certainly are predispositions toward compulsive behavior, or antisocial behavior, no?
16:17:37JohnSuler-mat more narcissistic levels of functioning, the compulsion has more to do with the regulation of self cohesion
16:17:39KimberlyYoung-PIf you want a full outline, I can point you to my web site where I have several articles posted there
16:18:10JohnSuler-mgood point Marlene... in a nutshell.. integration and balance of online and offline living
16:18:34G-NovitskyMarlene--that's a good and subtle point! How does healthy Internet usage compare to, for instance, healthy telephone usage?
16:18:41Azymike - i'm citing empirical research, that seeked permanent personality pattern across addictions.. Nothing was found similar!
16:19:03Steven-Stern--PIf I give up the net entirely, is the healthy balance disturbed?
16:19:12SteveBiggsKimberly, I'm not surprised to see escape as I think there is a real avoidance-depression cycle at work in any pathological over-use
16:19:23Dr-Mike-pAzy, I understand your point and the findings: No unidimensional "addict".
16:19:31JohnSuler-mYES! I think so
16:19:32JohnGroholOne thing you'll notice about the trends in "healthy" Internet usage is that the time spent online has increased substantially over the past 3 years...
16:19:33G-NovitskyAzy--were there clusters of similar patterns across several addictions?
16:19:39Azyright!!
16:20:30MarleneHow can you give up the net entirely, though...An "abstinence model" is not adequate...
16:20:35Azythat's the whole point - no consistent personality pattern
16:20:39Marleneabstinence - sorry
16:20:43StormI am in the process of documenting online porn and gambling addicts that had no prior history of any addiction problem until they found it online.
16:21:02JOINGil-Levin has joined.
16:21:25StormThere is opportunities for pathology online that do not exist offline.
16:21:27JohnSuler-minteresting Storm... what's your conclusion from that?
16:21:29Azykimberly - is there a measure that uses other data, not self-report?
16:21:43JohnSuler-mdid the internet "cause" their addiction?
16:21:44G-NovitskyStorm: no history of a problem, or no history of use?
16:21:54JohnSuler-mor simply activate something that was latent
16:22:00KimberlyYoung-PIt might be important to note that healthcare professionals are seeing a growing number of cases related to problem use of the Internet
16:22:19JohnSuler-m...(you think internet addiction might be genetic?)
16:22:22StormThere is a simple extension of f2f pathologies to online ones in the areas of porn and gambling
16:22:43StormG-Novitsky - both
16:22:47Dr-Mike-pUsing a "withdrawal" metaphor (for those who become aggressive and irritable if they have to go away for a day or more without computer access) I can certainly see the relevance of some of the DSM criteria. And John G's point about the ascendency of net use in "normal" life is well taken. I see lots of surveys into consumer habits tapping into hour-by-hour usage patterns.
16:22:50DanielleGood Point Kimberly...that is a real phenomena
16:22:58G-NovitskyDr. Young--but doesn't that happen with any new, pervasive enabling technology?
16:23:16KimberlyYoung-PIn clinical settings, self-report coupled with reports of family members is generally how therapists assess the issue, in addition to full scale intakes
16:23:28MarleneI don't doubt it, Kimberly - incidence of schizophrenia took a sharp increase when it was first diagnosed...
16:23:35KimberlyYoung-PG-I am not sure what you mean?
16:23:50JohnSuler-mThen could we say that in the 1930s and 40s we Americans go addicted to cars, since the rate of car purchases skyrocketed?
16:24:17G-NovitskyDr. Young: well, the aforementioned television and radio addictions, e.g.
16:24:25KimberlyYoung-PIn the training seminars I conduct, I include assessment for Internet related conditions directly into intake evaluations
16:24:37Stormwas car use associated with clinical impairment?
16:24:42Dr-Mike-pJohn S- You mean Americans *aren't* addicted to cars?? :-)
16:24:54JohnSuler-mlol, Michael!
16:24:59MarleneNo, John - I am saying that we have a hand in changing the landscape of the disorder we are trying to identify...
16:25:03Steven-Stern--PPerhaps there is some sort of Hawthorne effect here---we are concerned about a new technology until the next one comes along.
16:25:10G-NovitskyGood point, Marlene: once it's defined, it's diagnosed
16:25:27JohnSuler-mKimberly, you've done a lot of work in this area... where do you think this all is headed?
16:25:55JohnSuler-mAnd what about you Steven and Storm?
16:26:09SteveBiggsThen once it's diagnosed it tends to get overdiagnosed , a rebound effect?
16:26:41G-NovitskyTo quote Storm, both, Steve
16:26:46KimberlyYoung-PWell, I try not to predict John, but obviously we need more research and clinical work in this area
16:26:50Steven-Stern--PI am terrible at predicting what technological innovation will capture our attention next, so I can't guess where it will go from here.
16:27:39SteveBiggsnext addiction, cell phone?
16:27:48JohnSuler-mI wonder what people 100 years from now will say about these issues....
16:27:54KimberlyYoung-PWith that said, I must leave now as I have a three hour drive ahead of me and I need to get on the road. I want to thank John Suler for inviting me to this discussion and thank everyone for a great debate. Take care
16:28:10JohnSuler-m... or even 20 years for that matter
16:28:26JohnSuler-mBye Kimberly! Thanks for coming!!
16:28:27StormThanks Kimberly
16:28:31MarleneBefore you go Kimberly, I'd like to ask the group a question...
16:28:43AzyI still think we all give too much attention (and spend energy) on "Internet addiction(s)" and ignore other, very important negative Net behaviors. I hope we open some new directions now...
16:28:52JohnSuler-mAnother issue down the road... I think... is how powerful, very immersive VR environments will affect people.
16:29:11MarleneWould anyone mind if I reprinted some of the chat material presented here in an article in my School Newspaper?
16:29:11Azythanks kimberly
16:29:32G-NovitskyI agree with you, Azy
16:29:39JohnSuler-mMarlene, contact Gil Levin about that
16:29:51MarleneI will, thanks...
16:29:57JohnSuler-myes, Azy
16:29:58Dr-Mike-pWell, 100 yrs from now we'll have generations of people whose brains have been bombarded with 800 MHz of radio waves for extensive time periods. Maybe those that live will glow.... I do see cell-phone use as "addictive", big-time. But is it *good* to be communicative while driving a car or attending a show? Ciao, Kimberly!
16:30:03DanielleI also agree AZY
16:30:08G-NovitskyJohn, I think it will recall the discussions of Internet addiction
16:30:36AzyG. - maybe we discuss this more thoroughly in the CaseList group
16:30:40JohnSuler-mI'D LIKE TO THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING... IF YOU'D LIKE TO HANG AROUND AND CHAT FOR A WHILE, PLEASE DO
16:30:43MarleneI so agree, Dr. Mike - I really wonder about the effect that will have on us...
16:30:49G-Novitskysounds good, Azy
16:31:02StormI'd like to post one self report of net addiction just to remind us of the personal side of this.
16:31:14MarleneCase List group?
16:31:14JohnGroholI think that until we start better defining and agreeing upon the definitions of these "behavioral addictions," you're going to continue to see the types of divisions and issues plaguing this discussion.
16:31:21Gil-LevinThanks John for the great job in guiding the discussion!
16:31:27G-NovitskyThanks for arranging this, John
16:31:35Steven-Stern--PThanks for having me, it was a pleasure
16:31:43Storm" i'm not an irc junkie or a shop-a-holic online. i don't play video"
16:31:55JohnSuler-mI think these future VR environments will be very powerful... so in terms of "addiction"... we ain't seen nuthin' yet
16:31:56Stormrather than lose my job because of the time i spend online, i've just
16:31:58JohnGroholAnd that as researchers, we have to remember that just because two events occur at or near the same period of time, correlation does not equal causation.
16:32:05Azythank you John for handling the group!'
16:32:06Stormbetween work and home i probably spend 80-100 hours a week online. i
16:32:06JohnSuler-mThanks Steven!!
16:32:16Stormi got online in sept. 94. i broke up with my girlfriend in jan. 95. i
16:32:32Stormend quote
16:32:45AzyI'll never forget this comment, JohnG
16:32:58Stormi haven't had a girlfriend since then. i spend every waking second
16:33:09Stormnow end quote :-)
16:33:18JohnGroholI wish other researchers would keep that in the forefront of their minds!
16:33:26Dr-Mike-pJohn G- I don't feel "plagued"! :-) Absolutely it's worthwhile to try to discuss and come to consensus on terms and phenomena. But ultimately I think John S. nailed it by saying that as clinicians we often deal case by case. Thanks ,Johns S and G!
16:34:25JohnGroholNice chat... take care all.
16:34:35G-NovitskyYou too, JohnG
16:34:40JohnSuler-mOK... everyone here who is internet addicted raise your hand!
16:34:47JohnSuler-mBye John
16:34:51AzyOK, John, with NO CAUSAL effects, I'm signing off now. It's very late here...
16:34:52Dr-Mike-pOK, guess the party is over...going back to my Sunday addiction of reading the newspaper! :-) Take care, all. Enjoyed it.
16:35:12G-NovitskyWhose definition are we using, JohnS., mine or my husband's?
16:35:16SteveBiggsWell, thank you John S. for organizing another interesting online discussion. I look forward to the next.
16:35:26JohnSuler-mreally... do you ever think you spend too much time online...
16:35:31SteveBiggsciao
16:35:33JohnSuler-mbye Azy...thanks for coming
16:35:34G-Novitskygood night, Azy
16:35:49Azybye all
16:35:56MarleneI really try to structure my use...
16:36:22JohnSuler-mif you think you do... exploring those subjective experiences will tell you a lot about excessive internet use
16:36:29MarleneIt has become an essential tool, I must say...From PsychInfo Online to maintaining my band's webpage...
16:36:56G-NovitskyI make a point of allowing time for enjoyable and/or essential r/l activities
16:37:01JohnSuler-mas a psychoanalytically trained clinician, I think exploring those kinds of personal issues go a very long way
16:37:47JohnSuler-m... and it helps a great deal in clearing away the filters through which we see our own research
16:38:12G-NovitskyTrue
16:38:30G-NovitskyThank you again, and goodbye
16:38:52JohnSuler-mwith that thought, I too must say good bye!
16:39:04JohnSuler-mThank you all for coming!
16:39:31Stormthank you for having us
16:39:49DanielleThank you
16:41:39MarleneWe're dropping like flies...
16:42:19Stormi have to go. see ya
16:43:15MarleneHow many are still here? i can't tell with the frames...
16:44:47JOINlandry-sarah has joined.
16:44:48stephaniei see 6 people. Marlene
16:45:57Marlenewhat do you all think?
16:47:51MarleneI'm a grad student in NYC researching internet addiction for my dissertation..
16:48:45stephaniewhat's your exact topic, Marlene?
16:49:22MarleneContextualizing internet addiction...
16:50:29MarleneI am working on a survey to determine the role of the internet in people's lives..
16:51:12stephaniedo you do the survey online or offline?
16:51:39landry-sarahHi marlene I would just like to now how to deal with a my son's mother it does
16:51:45MarleneThe pilot is offline, then it'll go on the web along with offline ...
16:52:18MarleneAt first, you have to call people back multiple times...
16:52:31stephanieso, I'm a volunteer to participate then :-)
16:53:18MarleneThanks - I could use the feedback...There are so many minute issues involved in survey writing and validation...
16:54:09MarleneSarah? I'm not sure I understand your question.
16:54:19MarleneWhat are you studying, Stephanie?
16:56:46stephaniework & organizational psychologies, and mass media science
16:57:24MarleneInteresting - Internet use is a big issue in the workplace.

| Chat Events |