CHAT TRANSCRIPT - Jan. 24, 1999

20:45:28JOINJohnSuler has joined.
20:45:36Mark-Vardellwell cyndi this starting to feel like a regular chat rooms ....hope the adults come soon LOL
20:45:40tracy55>:-P
20:45:42JohnSulerHello all!
20:45:43janstercyndi, they have training sessions for hosts on AOL?
20:45:46Cyndi-FOAski!
20:46:01kathyuh oh the boss is here. *grabbing seat in back of classroom, behaving now ...*
20:46:08Cyndi-FOthey used to -- that was about 3 years ago
20:46:12Mark-Vardelloops one of the adults is here *just kidding* hiya John S
20:46:48JohnSulerHiya FO!
20:47:17jansterwaves to John
20:47:17Cyndi-FOJohn -- the program wouldn't let me sign on as just FO : (
20:47:29JOINmackie has joined.
20:47:43JohnSuleroh, that's a bummer, FO!
20:47:46Cyndi-FO(I will survive the humiliation of using my real name )
20:48:11kathyso mark? what makes an adult when chatting online? someone with no humor? pressure ... *grin*
20:48:17JohnSulerI see you all have been experimenting with smileys!
20:48:24Mark-Vardelllol cyndi...what is FO stand for anyway?
20:48:30LEAVEmackie has left.
20:48:50tracy55:-P
20:48:50Mark-Vardelllol kathy
20:48:57kathydon't tell him cyndi...ask him what his 3 dots mean first!!
20:49:01IDLE
20:49:06Cyndi-FObut I've heard lots of good guess! (my favorite being Fuzzy Otter)
20:49:23Mark-Vardelllol@kathy
20:49:28Cyndi-FOhis 3 dots means he's cybering!
20:49:57JOINGayla-Novitsky has joined.
20:50:00JohnSulerisn't that whisper notation interesting?
20:50:05tracy55(::()::)
20:50:21Mark-Vardelli will just be over there ------------------------------->
20:50:26JOINStofle has joined.
20:50:29JohnSulerit more closely simulates in-person conversation
20:50:37Cyndi-FOvery interesting -- now we know when people are talking behind our backs :D
20:50:50Cyndi-FOlol Mark
20:51:04tracy55:->
20:51:06jansterthe whispering here is 1 degree less informative than f2f: here we don't know to whom the person is whispering, f2f we would see it
20:51:16Cyndi-FOhow so John?
20:51:22kathyoops? Dr.Suler...when a whisper is sent, those dots indicate such? oops...if so, I owe an apology to Mark.
20:51:33Mark-Vardellcyndi i am looking forward to this...i have been looking at chat rooms a lot this past year
20:51:45JohnSuleryou can see that someone is whispering, but you don't know what's being said
20:51:48JOINClay-Tucker-Ladd has joined.
20:51:52Cyndi-FO(it's impolite in-person to whisper to others while in a group)
20:51:54tracy55:-&
20:52:06kathyit stimulates conversation too
20:52:09Cyndi-FOthis should be fun Mark!
20:52:16tracy55that's tongue tied :-&
20:52:18JohnSuler(you also don't know WHOM the person is whispering to
20:52:25Mark-Vardellapology to me John ....howcome?
20:52:35Gayla-NovitskySome chats actively discourage whispering
20:52:43Cyndi-FOlol tracy
20:52:57Mark-Vardellwell at least interesting cyndi *smiles*
20:53:00tracy55my lips are sealed :-X
20:53:10Cyndi-FOI've not been to a chat that discourages whispering
20:53:44Cyndi-FOmy god...what do people do for cyber if they can't whisper!
20:53:45Mark-Vardellprivate conversations are consistent in all the chat rooms i have seen
20:54:03Mark-VardellSWL @ cyndi
20:54:24jansteri've never seen a chat where you could tell someone was whispering (unless they made a typo !)
20:54:27JOINDr--Mike has joined.
20:54:31Gayla-NovitskyCyndi--I've seen meeting-format chats that do; also some of the hosted chats ask you not to whisper to the host
20:54:42tracy55undecided :-\
20:54:57JohnSulerhello Michael!!
20:55:00kathywell? mark started the whispering...he should be chastised.
20:55:05tracy55speaking with forked tongue :-W
20:55:07Stofle:0)
20:55:11JOINdora-weaver has joined.
20:55:23Gayla-Novitskytracy: lol
20:55:28Mark-Vardellbrb
20:55:36Cyndi-FOok...not whispering to a host isn't uncommon -- they can get swamped
20:55:37JOINJeff-Guterman has joined.
20:55:39Dr--MikeHi, just checking in!
20:55:46Cyndi-FOI take it this is a censored chat?
20:55:51tracy55big laugh :-D
20:56:04JohnSulercensored, FO?
20:56:12Cyndi-FOI didn't read the destructions...hee hee
20:56:33dora-weaverhello
20:56:34JOINarnie has joined.
20:56:36tracy55whoops, that didn't work. here's devilish wink ;->
20:56:36Gayla-NovitskyWhat are your rules, John?
20:56:48JOINTR3-Blondie has joined.
20:57:00TR3-Blondieevening All
20:57:10Cyndi-FOwhen you type the S word it keeps my post from appearing
20:57:10JohnSulerHi TR3!
20:57:15JOINJohnGrohol has joined. (Chat Manager)
20:57:25JohnSulerrules, GN?
20:57:27Cyndi-FOnow that's annoying
20:57:30TR3-BlondieHey John! hi hi hi to ALL!
20:57:33JohnGroholExpletives aren't allowed... evening all!
20:57:36StofleEvening John
20:57:49tracy55ok, enough talking to myself. hello all.
20:57:51TR3-Blondieoops should I have my REAL name in here too? (I don't mind)
20:57:54JohnSulerHi John!
20:58:21Cyndi-FOTR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
20:58:27LEAVEDr--Mike has left.
20:58:38TR3-Blondiehiya tracy! :)
20:58:45Cyndi-FOLooks like I can't even type it in whisper John
20:58:46JOINMichael-Fenichel has joined.
20:58:56TR3-BlondieFOOOOOO hey GF! HUGGZ
20:59:05JohnSulerreally cramps your style, eh FO?
20:59:17Cyndi-FOI wonder what other words are censored (evil grin)
20:59:25kathycyndi...if you need to type the S word..just misspell it...I mean sometimes you just have to say it! *grin*
20:59:33JOINkloe has joined.
20:59:44TR3-BlondieLOL @ John S
20:59:44Cyndi-FOwell, it's difficult to talk about chat and not talk about relationships
20:59:48JohnSulerlet's give it another 5 minutes or so before we "official" start
20:59:49Gil-LevinRight. John Suler's name is ot on the whisper list.
21:00:01JOINDick has joined.
21:00:15JOINInity has joined.
21:00:19Jeff-Gutermangood point FO
21:00:27dora-weaverIs this a test in patience? If so I am failing.
21:00:37kathy*grabs a seat next to cyndi* let's try it! you go first ... I'm a follower ..
21:00:38JohnSulermy name isn't on the whisper list?
21:00:39TR3-Blondiedid he block himself out whispers Gil? hehe
21:00:42InityHello from Russia for everyone :)
21:01:03Cyndi-FObesides, it's unbelievable to think that the s word constitutes something worth censoring
21:01:09Gayla-NovitskyIt is on my whisper list (>)
21:01:13Cyndi-FOgreetings Inity!
21:01:16TR3-BlondiePRIVET Inity! kok dilah?
21:01:23Cyndi-FOcockroach (just testing. LOL)
21:01:23JohnSulerHello inity!
21:01:25Mark-Vardellib....John does this have a way to log this session???
21:01:29kathywonder what happens at the stroke of 9? someone slams a gavel down?
21:01:43JOINRiver has joined.
21:01:52Jeff-GutermanMaybe I am slow, no I Am slow, but which "s" word...forget it!
21:01:54InityExcellent :) 4-56 AM in St.Petersburg... :)
21:01:58RiverGood Evening Everyone
21:02:05JohnSulerhey River!
21:02:49TR3-BlondieReeevah Baybee! hey there
21:02:50InityHi Dick - long time no see? :))
21:03:42LEAVEFoxylady has left.
21:03:44JOINTom has joined.
21:03:45JOINpam-Richardson has joined.
21:03:59Tomhello
21:04:24TR3-BlondieDick.. you in Europe or ..?
21:04:38TR3-Blondiehi to all who just arrived
21:04:43DickEurope. Latvia.
21:04:48Mark-Vardellhmmmm scrolling back is a bit difficult with the refresh
21:04:53Foxyladyhello all
21:04:55JOINLorrie has joined.
21:05:09TR3-Blondieahh by Lithuania and Estonia :) Gotcha
21:05:09Cyndi-FOHi Foxylady
21:05:17TR3-Blondiehi Foxy L!
21:05:18pam-Richardsonthank-you Hi
21:05:23JohnSuler... a few more minutes until we "start"
21:05:31Mark-Vardellbtw hiya Michael F....nice to see you on real time chat :-)
21:05:37RiverHi FoxyL
21:05:53JohnSulerA suggestion: Keep open a browser window containing the meeting program: http://www.voicenet.com/~suler/bolchat.html
21:05:55DickTR3-Blondie: right ;)
21:05:55LorrieMickey?
21:06:19Foxyladygood to see Riv again and TR-3 and Cyndi....cool!
21:06:26TR3-Blondiehi pam et al
21:06:27dora-weaverHi Lorrie: Lorrie from Semo?
21:06:32JOINmjpphd has joined.
21:06:43DickAny ideas about scrolling back with refresh 5? Except for switching to 60?
21:06:54kathyyes I have this bookmarked....I'm popping in an out cause I'm constantly booted...darn!
21:07:03LorrieYea, Lorrie from SEMO
21:07:10Mark-Vardell*getting out my notepad and sharpened pencils* lol
21:07:11Cyndi-FOsounds good....I'm taking a break
21:07:20JOINMartha has joined.
21:07:33Judy-KraybillHi mjp!
21:07:54mjpphdHi Judy!
21:08:36RiverI want to know where my avatar went?
21:08:52M--FenichelHi Mark, all, sorry I'm on the list twice since going back and forth a page! Just one me, though.
21:08:52JOINTammy has joined.
21:08:59dora-weaverLorrie: I am glad to see, hear, or experience you.
21:09:07Mark-Vardellhello again Michael Fenichel ...nice to see online ...in real time *smiles*
21:09:09JohnSulerthere will be some structure, yes Jeff
21:09:27Jeff-Gutermank
21:09:28LorrieNice to "cyber" with you too
21:09:43M--FenichelNice to be here, with and without structure. Here's a virtual toast! :-)
21:09:56DickGayla-Novitsky: OK, but I've my 1600x1280 locked by rendering on another machine... having only 800x600 here... which doesn't get much on screen,,, :(
21:09:58LorrieWhat is on the agenda?
21:11:04IDLE
21:11:18InityHi Boar :)
21:11:22JohnSuler*A suggestion: Keep open a browser window containing the meeting program: http://www.voicenet.com/~suler/bolchat.html
21:11:26Mark-Vardelllol Michael F *toasting back*
21:11:37Gayla-NovitskyDick: yiiiii,that IS a nuisance
21:11:40BoarHi Inity!=)
21:11:44JohnSuler(notice how the software doesn't let you repeat yourself?)
21:12:01Mark-Vardelllol john
21:12:18Mark-Vardelldon't why it repeated some messages
21:12:31JohnSulerWE HAVE AN EXCELLENT GROUP OF PEOPLE HERE!
21:12:40janstermark vardell just did repeat himself (twice at least)
21:12:43InityWhat a silence?...
21:12:51M--FenichelProbably cause I'm a fan of toasting at such get-togethers!
21:12:53JOINValerie-Hart has joined.
21:12:54JohnSulerWE DO HAVE A GENERAL STRUCTURE FOR OUR DISCUSSION TONIGHT
21:12:56TR3-Blondie*waving helloooo to all*
21:13:29JohnSulerhttp://www.voicenet.com/~suler/bolchat.html
21:13:53Cyndi-FOok
21:14:00JohnSulerANYONE CAN SPEAK AT ANY TIME
21:14:19JohnSulerIF NECESSARY, WE WILL MOVE TO A "HAND RAISING" FORMAT
21:14:40BoarEnjoy the silence =) depeche mode (c)
21:14:49JohnSulerWHAT'S IT LIKE BEING HERE?
21:15:00JOINCharlie-Seashore has joined.
21:15:07TomDoes anyone have access to DSM V discussions?
21:15:13JohnSulerWHAT IS THIS STYLE OF COMMUNICATING LIKE.. PROS... CONS...
21:15:40mjpphdJohn - so far, this discussion seems slow.
21:15:51BoarNo=) My real name is Sergey
21:16:01MarthaFeels a little more "present" than e-mail; to coincide in time, if not in space!
21:16:15tracy55what is it about chat that causes many of us to regress and act childlike?
21:16:29InityIRC Rules forever :))
21:16:34RiverBut less "present" than avatar type chats
21:16:36JohnSuleryes, "presence
21:16:37DickRe: Gayla-Novitsky: if only you _CAN_... here lies a difference between IRC and web-chats like this one.
21:16:37Jeff-GutermanDidn't like idea of chat software not being realtime (refreshing), but that is okay and it seems robust, so I like it
21:16:53kloeI prefer one on one chat
21:17:03LorrieNo other way to get the attention we experience in other conversations
21:17:12Gayla-NovitskyDick: I'm not sure what you mean
21:17:13JOINStephen has joined.
21:17:13Mark-Vardellhow so river?
21:17:17dora-weaverI notice that the lag time is causing me to experience some anxiety or some impatience. I also notice that I am experiencing a little paranoia.
21:17:17InityThese refreshing are annoying :(
21:17:24jansterjohn, with all due respect, this software is awkward compared to most chat systems i've seen, especially the upside down scrolling and the refresh thing
21:17:41JOINStephen-Lankton has joined.
21:17:48Gayla-Novitskyinity: I agree--the constant blinking blinking blinking
21:17:52kathyI think mIRC and PowWow (www.tribal.com) would be faster for chat ... little more complex at first, but it's quick to learn.
21:17:56Michael-FenichelI inadvertently whispered...I think we need to adjust to the 10 second echo, to get into the "synchronous" rhythm!
21:18:00InityYes, this scrolling up --> down is very unusual...
21:18:06TR3-Blondieanonymity I think, Tracy..
21:18:10Stoflethe upside down scrolling really threw me off.... I keep on trying to get to the bottom.
21:18:13Cyndi-FOactually, mine is refreshing fairly smoothly
21:18:16JohnGroholI dislike software which requires client downloads.
21:18:17RiverHow Many people here are Palace users?
21:18:17LorriePatience isn't listed as a virtual for no reason
21:18:20Mark-Vardelldora you will adjust and focus as any big chat room....selecting and focusing on the trend will become easier the more you do it
21:18:25JohnSuleryes, there are some disadvantages to Freechat... but it's advantage is that it's easy to use
21:18:25Chat GuyJohnSuler, I'm sorry to hear that...
21:18:27Gayla-Novitskyyes, I like mIRC too
21:18:42FoxyladyI'm a palace user
21:18:47dora-weaverThe silence brings back my memory of dealing with silence by clients when I was in graduate school.
21:18:48DickGayla-Novitsky: this thing virtually disables seeing whatever passes below the online screen, even if it's in the buffer (and in the browser, actually) because of that uncontrollable refresh
21:18:49InityPowWow was my first personal communicator... I remember the great day of my FIRST chat-experience with it... it was like a miracle, two years ago.
21:18:50JohnSulerahh..it's ChatGuy!
21:19:14JOINIgoriy has joined.
21:19:15Gayla-NovitskyIt sounds like Palace users get used to avatars very quickly
21:19:26Mark-Vardellinity you have other including myself pow wow users here :-)
21:19:27jansterthere are easy to use www chat clients that don't require plugins that are more like regular chats, certainly without refresh, and scrolling downwards
21:19:30Cyndi-FOyes Gayla
21:19:34TR3-Blondiewe do Gayla :)
21:19:41Cyndi-FOactually, text only is hard to adjust to
21:19:43Riverhaving an avatar adds an entire visual level to chat
21:19:52tracy55At least with this set up we have few technical problems. With more efficient chat setups, you have to help others deal with technical issues...
21:19:53Riveran say a lot without even speaking
21:19:58TR3-Blondieit feels there is a "body" -- yes
21:19:59LorrieDora: try playing music in the background it will help calm you and makes it a little easier to focus
21:20:00Cyndi-FOI'm used to using "props" to express some ideas
21:20:04JohnGroholnods
21:20:06kathyGayla, at a cocktail party, you have body language to help you know someone, in chat rooms, you have their words and sometimes the words share more about the person than a real time meeting
21:20:10Jeff-GutermanAny Active Worlds users?
21:20:12Foxyladyok starting to get used to this strange way of communicating. I really prefer the Palace to chat in.
21:20:12Gayla-NovitskyDick: I see that now--if you miss something, you are doomed here
21:20:16MarthaI do notice that I'm just as agoraphobic in here as I would be in a cocktail party.
21:20:22JohnSuler....(conversation seems confusing in chat... takes time to develop an "eye" for reading it)...
21:20:22InityI uninstalled PowWow some time ago, for it doesn't support russian language... :(
21:20:33JohnGroholThis is "minimalist chat."
21:20:35Mark-Vardellagree i like the avatar but also like the pureness of text only
21:20:41JOINElectra has joined.
21:20:45TR3-BlondieI agree, FOxy
21:20:47Cyndi-FOI haven't used Pow since ICQ came along
21:20:47Gayla-NovitskyKathy: I have bad hearing; at parties I often miss a lot of what's said, so I'm actually happier in chat
21:20:55pam-RichardsonI am new at this could someone discuss the Palace and how it is the same or different then chat rooms?
21:21:04StofleI'm used to the chat rooms on AOL.
21:21:07dora-weaverlorrie, do you get the same amount of lagtime when you use the webboard?
21:21:09Mark-Vardelllol gayla
21:21:09InityI used Active Worlds, but it is so SLOW! :(
21:21:09Gil-LevinI find it hard to comment in a timely way because there are so many messages. This may because there are so many of us, not because of the environment. because we ar
21:21:12IgoriyAbout than talk, friends?
21:21:16JohnSuler....(criss-crossed conversations)....
21:21:24JOINstorm has joined.
21:21:34janstergayla, i have the same condition and i agree, chat is only place i can "hear" large groups
21:21:38JohnSulerhello storm!
21:21:50Charlie-SeashoreTHE ACTION HAS STOPPED
21:21:54MarthaAlthough I'm uncomfortable in a crowd, when I worked with my therapist one on one in chat that was comfortable enough.
21:21:58Mark-Vardellhiya storm
21:21:58DickCyndi-FO: do you prefer ICQ chats over "pure IRC" clients? perhaps you're mostly using one-to-one style?
21:22:04Gayla-NovitskyGL: yes, it's tricky if you want to keep track of multiple threads
21:22:06Cyndi-FO<---picturing John on a Sofa scribbling notes while observing the group dynamics lol
21:22:12TR3-BlondiePalace has that log so I can follow chat as well as see "bodies"
21:22:13InityICQ became too much popular... but I don't like it.
21:22:25Charlie-SeashoreI'm back - sorry for the shout
21:22:26Michael-FenichelI work with kids who *love* chat rooms, and Kathy brings up an interesting point about say "visual" cues, like avatars. Perhaps they help you discriminate among the "noise" in busy cocktail, er, chat rooms.
21:22:27JohnSuler...(chat is often like a group free association)...
21:22:29stormhi all
21:22:38Cyndi-FOI like ICQ for many reasons -- but not for group chat
21:22:38LorrieNo, I have high-speed modem and trying to read it all is difficult
21:22:50pam-Richardsonthank-you
21:23:14Mark-Vardellplay is the binding thing in chat that i notice John
21:23:15InityOur channel on IRC is a meeting place of friends - subscribers of the same newsgroup (conference).
21:23:21Cyndi-FOIRC was difficult for me, which is why I began with AOL
21:23:27tracy55since we don't have nonverbals to help us feel heard I notice that we say each other's names a lot in chat. sometimes it's kind of like a caress. Having our name typed by someone is an acknowledgement.
21:23:39JohnSuleryes... play... banter...
21:23:45Gayla-Novitsky(I'm going to have to take a look at Palace)
21:23:47BoarInity, are you don't like ICQ? =)
21:23:49Jeff-GutermanAnyone use CUSeeMe?
21:23:53jansterIRC clients nowadays allow you to have some visual (color) cues, and even sound (wave files), but not really multimedia
21:23:53TR3-BlondieI found more "smut" feel to IRC and AOL.not meant to offend
21:23:57Foxyladythe Palace is a good place to chat because you can create a room around you that fits whatever mood your in....like a beach, or forest, or mountains...its cool
21:24:01Michael-FenichelHi Storm, John, Gil ... And I love ICQ for real-time among a few friends or family.
21:24:16Cyndi-FOThere were lots of non-smut places on AOL -- but you have to hunt them down : )
21:24:19Mark-Vardellyes and creativity is the positiveness in chat rooms i believe
21:24:26LEAVEMartha has left.
21:24:26LEAVEIgoriy has left.
21:24:28TR3-BlondieI USED to Jeff.. not even sure why I stopped
21:24:46Lorrieaddress for the palace?
21:24:50InityBoar: or you haven't heard about this many times? I don't like ICQ. And, ICQ is huge security hole and "Big Brother's eye" in your computer :))
21:24:55JOINMarthaAinsworth has joined.
21:24:57TR3-Blondieas an aside.. I tried AOL 5 or 6 yrs ago
21:24:59DickCyndi-FO: there are lots of IRC clients quite easy to setup... and easy to use, I believe. VIRC might be an example. ICQ'98 appears to be even more complicated.
21:25:10Cyndi-FOEvery chat has it's own cache of gems -- it takes patience to find sometimes though
21:25:16JohnSulerhi Martha!
21:25:24tracy55In whatever chat setup, there's a big difference between going into an existing chat room and creating your own chat with invited participants.
21:25:37JOINBillie has joined.
21:25:37Cyndi-FODick -- I confess, it's been 6 years since I tried IRC
21:25:38pam-Richardsonyes I will have to check out the palace myself soon
21:25:39Gayla-NovitskyICQ is now owned by AOL, I believe
21:25:44Cyndi-FOSo I'm sure it's improved!
21:25:47MarthaAinsworthHi - I was here before but I just decided I'd better add my last name!
21:25:49Tom!
21:25:58Cyndi-FOyes, AOL purchased ICQ
21:25:59TR3-Blondieyes Gayla.. yer right
21:26:03Charlie-SeashoreI've been using chat for meetings of doctoral committees doing interim work with students as a means of saving money on conference calls. It is quite slow and a bit trying, but with practice it can work relatively efficiently. Each group has to get up to speed.
21:26:05Mark-Vardelllol martha :-)
21:26:06Boarhi Igoriy!=)
21:26:09Cyndi-FOWB Martha!
21:26:23JOINConrad-Newman has joined.
21:26:23StofleI knew it was you, Martha.
21:26:32JOINDoug-W has joined.
21:26:33LorrieMickey, turn the frames off and it is easier
21:26:34janstercyndi, they have GUI point&click clients for irc that make it a lot easier than the old command-line style
21:26:54InityVIRC ? brrr... mIRC forever! Or even, IRC in Telnet session! ... I begin to hate GUI... Somebody present me new hard drive, please, then I'll set up Unix on my second machine which is without hard drive now :))
21:26:57tracy55I teach Internet chat and conferencing. Feel free to use class website: http://www.webwinds.com/irc/chat.htm
21:27:01JohnGroholthe IRC networks still suffer from lag, and a myriad of other problems, which keeps them less than reliable (IMO).
21:27:06Gayla-NovitskyCharlie: up to speed in terms of ease of using the software?
21:27:25Gil-LevinCharlie, your experience gives me hope :)
21:27:31Cyndi-FOlol...we have some serious geeks in here :D
21:27:55jansterjohngrohol, there are literally hundreds of different IRC nets now, large and small, domestic, international, specialized, private, tons of 'em
21:28:12Gayla-NovitskyMSN gave its chat-software IRC capabilities and it has been driving us nuts ever since
21:28:14Riverbeside the refresh and inverted screen this isn't too terrible
21:28:26JohnSulerhow are people finding this discussion so far?
21:28:29JohnGroholI'm mainly talking about the larger, established public networks that most people still use.
21:28:32Gayla-NovitskyTracy: I'll stop by!
21:28:36Cyndi-FOIt takes incredible energy to move someone off of their favorite
21:28:44Jeff-GutermanNice flow, John
21:28:50InityI'm truing to understand, is here the difference between english- and russian-language chats......
21:29:04JohnSuleris anyone experiencing any difficulties?
21:29:26Mark-Vardellyes cyndi i noticed that too .... actually i have found the same level interaction on irc and yahoo as pow wow
21:29:32LorrieSomehow I feel like I just got lost and winded up in Silicone Valley
21:29:33Electraoh my yes .. have had that fun with solid icq fans I tried to invite to Palace
21:29:33DickJohnGrohol: it appears people are actually mostly using global IRC networks rather for wide-area communications... preferring small a la private nets for everyday use
21:29:38pam-RichardsonI frequent a chat room where the people actual meet every month in a central location
21:29:46M--FenichelWorking real smooth, at 5 seconds per refresh....
21:29:59tracy55This chat...and many chats...are very much like big family dinner conversations where everybody's talking and yelling and hardly anyone's listening or responding.
21:30:02Mark-Vardellwhat really makes a chat room is the level and depth of the regulars there
21:30:03JohnSulerwhat are the features of chat that people like?
21:30:04BoarIgoriy Here minimum 3 persons from Russia =)
21:30:05Jeff-GutermanI am prone to wanna "stop time," and have people go one at a time and work through ideas....it takes time and patience on chat, though.
21:30:13Cyndi-FOlol Jeff...yes
21:30:32LEAVEM--Fenichel has left.
21:30:35BoarIgoriy go to www.xxlmusic.sp.ru =)
21:30:36RiverOK..People are chatting...regardless of the client
21:30:49JOINKEVIN-GROLD has joined.
21:30:51tracy55With more than 5-6 people, it tends to become a free-for-all unless there's a means of focus.
21:30:52dora-weaverJohn; I misunderstood you. You suggested we talk about our chat experience. It seems as though most of us thought you meant technical problems. However, I thought you meant our psychological experiences.
21:30:58jansterjohnsuter, i like reading top to bottom! most recent stuff at bottom of scroll
21:31:00IDLE
21:31:01JohnSuleryes, jeff,the discussion is not linear (reminds me of faculty meetings!)
21:31:05Riverwhats better or different about cyber vs real life ??
21:31:07pam-Richardsonpeople like the fact that they are judged by their comments instead of their looks
21:31:19Electrahi FO.. *s*
21:31:23IgoriyO, girls - as you here much!!!
21:31:26Cyndi-FOWow...I saw my name followed by some expletives -- seems normal!
21:31:41InityI feel psychological comfort chatting in my favorite program...
21:31:49Foxyladyhaha cyndi
21:31:54JohnSuleryes, I meant psychological experience of chat... which is linked to how the software is designed
21:31:58RiverYes Pam Richardson...the physical doesn't matter
21:32:02Billie<smile> FO
21:32:34LEAVEConrad-Newman has left.
21:32:34Gayla-NovitskyConversational multi-tasking is fun!
21:32:41InityI like to set my custom colors, sounds... to feel myself comfortable with chat...
21:32:44Riverthere is also a large degree of physical safety too
21:32:54Cyndi-FOchat makes it easy to have a social life in an otherwise busy real life
21:32:55BoarInity, you favorite program...is ICQ?=))
21:32:56JohnSulerit IS interesting how one feels at home in one's favored chat environment
21:33:01Electrawhy do people call it real life..rather than offline?
21:33:15Billiedifferent cocktail parties different levels of comfort
21:33:17Cyndi-FOfolks are so busy these days, it's exhausting to think of leaving the house
21:33:23jansterjohnsuter, i find myself having to work too hard to follow the flow of the conversation cause it's upside down, i don't like having to pay so much attention to the act of reading, rather than the content
21:33:23pam-RichardsonI think that the anonymity of the whole chat whole has the greatest impact on the communication
21:33:29JOINEllen has joined.
21:33:30JOINRichard has joined.
21:33:30JohnGroholI don't think most programs and technologies think very much about the psychology of the user experience nearly as much as they should, especially things like chat...
21:33:33KEVIN-GROLDAnyone heard about LIVE Counseling Online?
21:33:37D--HeltonYes Cyndi I agree, with very little risk
21:33:38Gayla-NovitskyElectra: because "meat life" sounds yucky
21:33:43LorrieThe thing about chat rooms is that we can agree to talk about only one subject, but because their are no social rules everyone talks about whatever they want anyway.
21:33:47JohnGroholAlthough that is thankfully changing more and more each year.
21:33:49Mark-Vardellagee cyndi....and a development of long term friendship....not any less than f2f
21:33:56InityYou mean there is life outside of Internet?! (c) R. Hayden
21:33:59Cyndi-FOlittle risk -- and also can be done on your terms
21:34:05Cyndi-FOlol Inity
21:34:10Gil-LevinI agree with Janster that this is hard work.
21:34:16RiverNot for some people Igo
21:34:19Cyndi-FOwhen you're ready or have time
21:34:24Gayla-NovitskyKeven: you mean the Doc in England ?Razziterri or whatever?
21:34:35InityBoar: my favorite is mIRC for chatting
21:34:38Mark-Vardelllol inity
21:34:43D--Heltonyes Cyndi, one can choose to ignore those don't want to respond to
21:34:44DickJohnGrohol: customizable IRC clients with advanced GUI interfaces appear to be much more psychologically adaptive than 'traditional' chat programs
21:34:53Cyndi-FOBut...being able to chat with people from all over the world is a real bonus
21:35:07pam-Richardsonpeople will say things that they wouldn't necessary say to a person when first meeting in real life
21:35:17RiverJohn G..have you seen or used visual chats..ie Palace?
21:35:17janstergil, to me it seems counter intuitive to read a page bottom to top... makes me wonder if this is an experiment on purpose :)
21:35:19Foxyladyyeah I heard about counseling on line. There is even a palace set up for it. But no one is ever there when I went.
21:35:22BoarIgoriy,Good luck
21:35:22JohnGroholDick............ Yes, but such client interfaces were not in the original implementation or design of IRC over a decade ago. Relatively new phenomenon...
21:35:26KEVIN-GROLDGayla--this is different--i will send you the web page.
21:35:34LEAVEIgoriy has left.
21:35:39MarthaAinsworthKevin, I've done it (as a patient)
21:35:42Cyndi-FOPersonally, I don't see how counseling online can be effective
21:35:58KEVIN-GROLDhttp://www.1-800-therapist.com/event.html
21:35:58MarthaAinsworthsorry about the unintentional whisper
21:35:58BoarHi Dick :)
21:36:00IDLEarnie has left.
21:36:00DickJohnGrohol: OK, just like web chats.
21:36:00D--Heltonthe visual chat of Palace for example seems easier to keep up with as far as people's conversations
21:36:11KEVIN-GROLDMartha--what was it like?
21:36:14Gayla-NovitskyKevin: thanks--I am building a database for my thesis
21:36:19DickHi Boar ;)
21:36:19JOINLiz has joined.
21:36:41JohnGrohol"BetaChat" is in this program's name for a reason... this is not a commercial chat client... It has some aspects which are being worked on, and definitely the reading top to bottom is one of them.
21:36:46D--Heltonperhaps I'm not as used to this medium
21:36:46Cyndi-FOAll chat is confusing with initial experience
21:36:48LEAVELiz has left.
21:36:54LorrieWith a one on one, on-line counseling can have benefits, but for more than one on one its too hard to have structure.
21:36:55Gayla-NovitskyKevin: I think those are the phone referral people--Thanks for the info
21:36:56kathywhy not cyndi? ever help a person with a problem on line? a therapist can do the same....
21:36:59Mark-Vardellone thing about anonimity .... profiles seems more and more elaborate on some chat programs...wonder if anonimity as a feature will pass soon
21:37:03stormchatting in a group is very different from using this for a one to one
21:37:04Cyndi-FOmany who first try Palace are confused until they adjust
21:37:07pam-RichardsonGayla what is your thesis on?
21:37:13MarthaAinsworthKevin - it was pretty profound
21:37:18dora-weaveraddress for Palace?
21:37:26Cyndi-FOBecause it seems counseling requires an ability to see facial expressions
21:37:31InityI like the ascetic IRC window. Not many funny buttons, I don't like these bright colors and colorful windows... I like IRC, it's ascetic. I like green letters on a black screen...
21:37:33KEVIN-GROLDStofle--can you send me an email about your experience? grold@1-800-therapist.com
21:37:34Cyndi-FOor hear the tone of voice
21:37:36kathy*waving to liz from back of room* saved you a seat!
21:37:40BoarDick: lv?=)
21:37:46Cyndi-FOhttp://www.thepalace.com
21:37:49Mark-Vardellfor example as technology increases and we have video and voice capabilities too
21:37:54stormGayla-Novitsky - what is your thesis?
21:37:56DickBoar: mhm ;)))
21:37:58D--Heltonthepalace.com is one place to get on dora
21:37:58Cyndi-FOperhaps online combined with f2f can be effective
21:38:01JohnGroholD-Helton....... Yes, and no. I've spent a fair amount of time in a palace and found that sometimes the conversations were just as difficult to follow... and the balloons restricted long notes at one time...
21:38:08Stoflecheck out my web site at http://members.aol.com/stofle/index.htm
21:38:19MarthaAinsworthIf you want to know more about therapy online you can check out my site http://www.metanoia.org/imhs/
21:38:25Gayla-Novitskypam/storm: group counseling in cyberspace
21:38:27Electrahttp://www.thepalace.com/welcome/index.html
21:38:28Cyndi-FOright John...each chat has their quirks and limitations
21:38:45MarthaAinsworthCyndi - for some people, having no visual contact makes it way easier to talk about hard things. that was my experience.
21:38:49Mark-Vardellyes cyndi
21:38:51JohnGroholCyndi............ Agreed. And we all have our personal preferences which aren't like to change any time soon! ;-)
21:39:01Cyndi-FOyes Helton -- I've killed people like you on Palace :P
21:39:25D--Heltonha ha cyndi
21:39:27ElectraLOL FO!!!
21:39:35InityStofle: server says it's too busy ...
21:39:35dora-weaverThanks Cyndi.
21:39:37D--Heltonsay it was me making long notes
21:39:38Cyndi-FOMartha -- are we talking about online counseling of people you've met f2f or total strangers?
21:39:41Jeff-GutermanI think active Worlds is excellent,although it is only available to PC users, no Macs...at http://www.counselingzone.com, we have our own virtual world called Genrica with animated, not static, avatars in a 3D environment.
21:39:57Cyndi-FO(just kidding Holton. hee hee)
21:40:00stormGayla-Novitsky: group email or chat or both - counseling in cyberspace
21:40:17pam-Richardsonit sounds very interesting Gayla, I want to do my thesis on the online chatting habits of college students
21:40:20Stoflesorry Inity :0(
21:40:22tracy55Some people like me prefer to write/talk slowly, in depth, many sentences. Others are geared to quick oneliners. Email mentality vs. chat mentality.
21:40:30MarthaAinsworthCyndi - strangers. I hadn't met my therapist f2f when we worked online. (I later did.)
21:40:31JohnSulerWOULD YOU LIKE TO (1) SWITCH TO A HAND RAISING FORMAT, OR, (2) STAY IN THIS OPEN DISCUSSION?
21:40:45Cyndi-FOright tracy -- I belong to listserves because those allow greater depth
21:40:47Inity2, 2, 2...
21:40:56Jeff-Guterman(1)
21:41:01LEAVEKEVIN-GROLD has left.
21:41:01InityPlease, don't switch...
21:41:01Gayla-NovitskyStorm: what I'd like to do is chat, personally. I am including both types in the database portion
21:41:07Lorriehand please
21:41:09pam-Richardson1
21:41:09RiverHOW about Q&A with hands John
21:41:12Electrahand raising format??
21:41:15RichardI haven't found the greater depth! What are listserves?
21:41:20Gil-LevinI think it would be less chaotic goals and high motivation.
21:41:21Michael-FenichelJohn- I'd enjoy either...perhaps you'd "summarize" the first segment?Electra- How refreshing! I hear lots of people who consider "offline" to mean "on hold with tech support"! :-)
21:41:22MarthaAinsworth1
21:41:33InitySwitching to hand raising will kill all beauty of chat-conversation freedom...
21:41:44Cyndi-FOJohn....if there are specific topics you want to cover, how about leading the discussion?
21:41:54TomI've had chats where "!" & ":)" (the ascii version, that is) were all I used...like 'huh-huh'
21:41:54D--Heltonhas anyone used counselingonline.com's Palace site?
21:42:03Cyndi-FOthen moving to a new topic when ready?
21:43:01JOINStacy-Horn has joined.
21:43:07LEAVEEllen has left.
21:43:09JohnSulerThen I'll call on the next HAND in line to present the next question or idea.
21:43:26Inity:(((
21:43:32JOINNexxie has joined.
21:43:32LEAVERichard has left.
21:44:00Stacy-HornSorry I'm late, rehearsal for my band went late.
21:44:03Michael-FenichelHAND
21:44:09Electrahi nexxie
21:44:23JohnSulerMICHAEL?
21:44:32Gil-LevinHAND We are talking about "What are the features of this chat environment?
21:44:33NexxieHi El
21:45:00Foxyladysorry, I got to go...byebye all.
21:45:00Chat GuyGoodbye, Foxylady... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
21:45:10JOINAngeL has joined.
21:45:16Michael-FenichelQuickie- I find it interesting, looking at the format, that in fact in Part 1 we did see "how it works" and actually move towards what it can be used for!
21:45:21Cyndi-FOby FL!
21:45:26Stacy-HornCan someone fill me in on the current topic?
21:45:32LEAVEFoxylady has left.
21:45:42Electrahi angle
21:45:52JohnSulerOK... lets talk about the use of chat.HAND?
21:45:52LEAVEarnie has left.
21:45:54AngeLhello
21:46:15JohnSulerRIVER?
21:46:17Mark-VardellMichael i don't know the use but i see the attraction to chat rooms
21:46:29RiverWhat do people think of the FUTURE of online chat???
21:46:33Jeff-GutermanI don't quite understand what you meant, Michael, that we have moved forward, that we have not, and/or that we should?
21:46:33AngeLhey Electra
21:46:34BillieHand
21:46:37LorrieSomebody needs a lot of attention. Isn't that right Inity?
21:46:43RiverHow might it evolve??
21:47:34D--HeltonI like going where "everybody knows my name" as they say
21:47:39Cyndi-FOthink of chat as a communication tool...good for some things
21:47:42kathyhand
21:48:05Michael-FenichelMy observation was that we went beyond discussing technology, and there was a movement towards questions on chat, counseling, etc, online.
21:48:06D--HeltonIt's fun to talk to others in the comfort of my home and unwind about my day
21:48:10TammyRiver ..I my self think that if chat is to become too popular people will stop feeling the way humans were meant to feel. It is too easy to become detatched
21:48:15Riverand good for more and more things as more people get wired??
21:48:17tracy55One feature of this chat is that if you walk away for 2 minutes you can't catch up with what you missed. The screen moves forward and you can't read more than one minute of what was before.
21:48:23Gayla-NovitskyStacy: But don't you have more physical access to most of the people you want to talk to anyway?
21:48:58Cyndi-FOI think chat is here for the long haul River
21:49:00JohnGroholI think the future is what you see here -- people finding chat communities, all using different technologies, that they enjoy best. . . That fit into their lives, their personalities, their ways of interacting... and then staying with them.
21:49:01RiverGood Point Tammy....but people who chat do get together in real life
21:49:17Gil-LevinHAND
21:49:22Cyndi-FOIt may evolve and improve, but it has become as important as the telephone
21:49:35Riverand it can enhance our off line world
21:50:00Michael-FenichelJeff--Of course we move forward, but not equally all the time in terms of the technology, theory, or practice. I think chat for pure socialization fun is this generation's telephone and cb radio rolled into one! John G's right, we're all the future, whether we like this IRC or that one! :-)
21:50:01JohnSulerchat is an art form
21:50:04Electrauhmmm..whats a telephone??
21:50:05BillieAgrees with Inity and D--Helton
21:50:07Gayla-Novitskyand the telephone didn't dehumanize us
21:50:14Cyndi-FOTammy -- chatting online hasn't replaced f2f
21:50:16JohnSuler... so I think people will also want it around
21:50:26D--Heltonyes river, just like having a pen pal in England enhanced my world as a kid
21:50:28stormthere are people that are involved online that are turned off by the multi-tasking needed for chat. it is not attractive to everyone
21:50:29Cyndi-FOlol Electra. the thing yer modem is hooked to
21:50:31Riverlol @ Electra
21:50:36Stacy-HornI prefer non-realtime conversations. Like what happens on The WELL (and Echo).
21:51:11Charlie-SeashoreWhat happened to Gil's hand?
21:51:16RiverYes Stacy H..you can be more thoughtful in postings
21:51:18TammyCyndi but the way things are going with online chats it may
21:51:24Stacy-HornChat is good for light, conversation.
21:51:30Billiealready made John continue
21:51:32Mark-Vardellrelationship are formed online and as John Suler indicated f2f often really cements a relationship that began in a chat room
21:51:39Judy-KraybillTeleconferencing on bridge lines is very comfortable and easy to use...
21:51:48Billietossing you an extra "L"
21:51:51RiverOr ends it
21:51:52tracy55i think we need to differentiate one to one from group in regard to chat. very different experience.
21:51:55Stofleone on one chat can be quite meaningful.
21:51:59JohnSulerLET'S MOVE ON TO KATHY'S COMMENT/QUESTION
21:52:04JOINKen-Norton has joined.
21:52:17D--Heltonyes Stacy, but I could see chat used by a therapist for group with structured rules up front
21:52:20Mark-Vardelli disagree there is play and light but i have seen ppls use chat for much deeper and meaning forms of support
21:52:36Cyndi-FOme too Mark
21:52:47Cyndi-FOand I disagree stacy -- there is a sense of history
21:52:57D--Heltonyes mark I agree
21:52:58Cyndi-FOlike with any community.
21:52:59InityModerating a chat is like a trying to herd ferrets... :)
21:53:04Gayla-Novitskyme too, Mark
21:53:06Stacy-HornI only speaking generally, Mark.
21:53:17Riverlol inity
21:53:18JohnSuleryup, that's fer sure, Inity
21:53:21Cyndi-FOfriend from Palace visited me in Seattle and we began reviewing "screen caps" the same way my family looks over photo albums
21:53:26Billie<smile> Inity
21:53:35JohnSulerKATHY, DID YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING?
21:53:37kathylol Inity!
21:53:38Mark-Vardellyes i am constantly amazed at he history and sharing of life experiences by regulars of a room
21:53:40Cyndi-FOlol John
21:53:42LorrieSeems to be a structure problem for groups. Everyone can speak whenever. No true sense of order.
21:53:56JOINSusan has joined.
21:54:16Stacy-HornCyndi, again speaking generally but what chat service do you visit that has history? I'm not saying it doesn't exist, I'm just saying it's unusual.
21:54:20RiverSO, with structure and history it sounds like community?
21:54:34JohnSulerOKAAAY....GIL, I THINK YOU HAD YOUR HAND UP NEXT
21:54:35Cyndi-FOPalace has history
21:54:36LorrieInity is right on the money!!
21:54:38BillieI have three IRC channels...and I assure you there is a sense of history
21:54:47Mark-Vardell*shutting up now* lol
21:54:54D--Heltonwhy couldn't the same type of order exist as in a f2f group?
21:54:55kathyI did comment Dr.Suler....said chatting was here to stay because everyone (business/school, etc.) is using it now
21:55:04JOINJoeni-Jones has joined.
21:55:10LEAVEDick has left.
21:55:21Charlie-SeashoreThis is exactly like my experience the first night I met Edie's (wife) parents
21:55:30JOINJim-Jarvis has joined.
21:55:32Cyndi-FOJohn -- maybe introduce a topic yourself and give us 10 minutes to hash out :D
21:55:33Stacy-HornCyndi -- I can go back and read conversation that took place since the place began?
21:55:37Gil-LevinI forgot what I was going to say when I said HAND. We have moved on.
21:55:39Gayla-NovitskyDhelton: lack of enforcement?
21:55:49Cyndi-FONot ALL conversations (but can you do that offline?)
21:55:58JohnSulerTOPIC: CAN CHAT BE USED FOR PSYCHOTHERAPY?
21:56:00IDLE
21:56:04LorrieSense people feel free to be themselves without retribution its also interferes with their sense of order
21:56:07Cyndi-FOIn fact, what conversations can you go back and review in "real life?"
21:56:09River!YES
21:56:21Stofleyes
21:56:48MarthaAinsworthYes! It worked for me.
21:56:50Billiethat is the crux....define psychotherapy?
21:56:58stormchat can be used for test-based therapy, one to one or groups that are moderated
21:57:00IDLEValerie-Hart has left.
21:57:00IDLEStephen-Lankton has left.
21:57:00JohnGroholChat can be used to help people with emotional or relationship problems, certainly. I'd be hard pressed to automatically call it psychotherapy, though.
21:57:02Cyndi-FOI'm a layman John. But it seems chat can only be used effectively if combined with f2f
21:57:07dora-weaverhand
21:57:15InityWhy not? I think that it perfectly can be used for that. I like to share my problems in chats with close friends - why not to chat with psychotherapist.
21:57:26StofleA therapeutic relationship can be formed in a chat room
21:57:31Stacy-HornIn real life there are structures in place for keeping records of the town,city, etc.
21:57:58MarthaAinsworthI'm looking for a url of a transcript of a chat between a psychotherapist and a patient that was sent to me...
21:58:08LorrieRespect comes from time spent or social rules. There are no social rules in cyber.
21:58:35Cyndi-FOnot true lorrie -- there are a ton of chat etiquette rules
21:58:38Stacy-HornI am not anti-online communities. I run one one. I started it in 1989.
21:58:55BillieLorrie there are social rules...ask anyone banned from a channel
21:58:59RiverA lot of therapy can be had in just being able to vent emotions to a listener..Is that not therapeutic??
21:59:01MarthaAinsworthUpon reading it you would certainly have to call it therapeutic. Goes way beyond emotional support or "counseling" (whatever that is)
21:59:03LorrieHow do you enforce them?
21:59:18Cyndi-FOKathy -- I don't disagree with you, but I am not sure I would call that professional therapy
21:59:28Cyndi-FOthat's what we call friendship
21:59:31AngeLI agree 100 percent with kathy....... we are all there for each other
21:59:43Cyndi-FOLorrie -- they are enforced like many things -- via peer pressure
21:59:45Stacy-Horn(Speaking as a non-therapist.)
21:59:49jansterstacy, you just seem to prefer asynchronous to synchronous communication :) there are many kinds of community history, not all of which are archived
21:59:49JOINM-Fenichel has joined.
22:00:03D--HeltonJohn (or other researchers), where do you think research is headed regarding this broad topic?
22:00:07Cyndi-FOSo people don't do it often : )
22:00:09InityI moderate four conferences and run IRC channel :) These are true communities of people... friends.
22:00:11MarthaAinsworthCyndi, therapists work with patients online every day. It's not theoretical, it happens daily... people get real help.
22:00:12Stofleonce you've done it, you see the problems you would think that would prevent psychotherapy from happening just aren't there.
22:00:12Chat GuyI don't know, but I do know that isn't it.
22:00:28JohnSulerI wonder if chat communities are therapeutic?
22:00:34stormto call it psychotherapy invites comparisons to f2f therapy. text-based therapy has it own set of advantages and disadvantages and con NOT be compared to f2f therapy
22:00:45LorrieI don't see it. Read how this is going. No one is obeying the "rules" set out just a few minutes ago.
22:00:58InityWhat do you think about trying to heal the Internet-Addiction On-Line?
22:01:13JohnSulerI can't define psychotherapy, but I KNOW IT WHEN I SEE IT!
22:01:26Electra(one more example of herded ferrets??)
22:01:37Stacy-HornI see no reason for agreeing on definitions in order to begin to look at how people communicate online and try to understand and use it.
22:01:42Cyndi-FObecause lorrie -- sometimes it's also good to allow a room to define it's own pace
22:01:47Gayla-NovitskyJohnSuler: LOL
22:01:48LorrieExactly!
22:01:54JohnSuler(I think we've dispensed with the hand raising format)
22:01:54Riverlog off and snail mail us when your cured Inity
22:02:03Mark-Vardelllol john grohol.....hmmm you know i really think that a therapist before he or she can really begin to "help" online is to fully immerse themselves in the nuances of chat rooms and internet communication before anything can happen
22:02:06JohnSuler(I sorta like the free-for-all myself!)
22:02:11Cyndi-FOwell stacy -- I see a huge difference between casual chat and actual therapy
22:02:24Billieto compare f2f to online is to compare apples to oranges
22:02:26LorrieSurvival of the most persistent?
22:02:32Cyndi-FOhee hee lorrie
22:02:39StofleMark - that's a neccessary competency.
22:02:41Cyndi-FOor the fastest typer!
22:02:46Mark-Vardelli think therapist consider online therapy should they themselves avoid the "newbie syndrome"
22:02:48M-FenichelI'm wondering whether there's both "chat *for* therapy", and chat *as* therapy. Research always shows that people go first to friends and family before going out to a professional office....
22:02:57MarthaAinsworthCyndi, there are a lot of other options in between casual chat and f2f therapy!
22:03:12Tomit's the survival of the most adaptable, isn't it?
22:03:23SusanIs the conference still going on?
22:03:34Cyndi-FOAgreed Martha -- and online chat in combination with other things might be considered a viable form of therapy
22:03:37LorrieMickey? You still here?
22:03:53Gayla-NovitskyM-Fenichel: the contact with cyberfriends can certainly take the place of contact with rl friends
22:03:55JohnSuleryes, Susan, if you want to stretch the definition of "conference"!
22:04:01Cyndi-FObut online chat as the only form of therapy ... I would label that therapist a quack
22:04:09stormwhen online is combined with f2f, there is less room for projection and transference
22:04:42JohnSulerI hate you for saying that Storm!! (LOL)
22:04:43LorrieYes, the most adaptable but the most adaptable without running over your fellow man is the "IDEA"
22:04:44JOINBrain has joined.
22:04:58stormcalling online therapy invites comparisons to f2f therapy
22:05:00IDLE
22:05:02RiverSo its a new field..it will evolve
22:05:07Cyndi-FOok -- so how does a therapist know when an online person is lying about themselves?
22:05:13Stacy-HornI run an online service and I've found the ftf element is crucial to preserving community. In a recent poll, 83% said they get together with other people who use my service (it's called Echo).
22:05:25Cyndi-FOand if you don't know basic facts, how can you help them?
22:05:39stormtext-based therapy has it own set of advantages and disadvantages and can NOT be directly compared to f2f therapy, imho
22:05:40Judy-KraybillForgive the newbie question: But what is LOL?
22:05:41JohnSulerYES, STACY!
22:05:49Chat GuyI don't know, but I do know that isn't it.
22:05:56tracy55i think it's too easy to respond to the symptom and not the real problem in online counseling. especially if someone has dysfunctions related to lack of empathy in early life. the healing is usually nonverbal.
22:05:57Cyndi-FOLOL=laughing Out Loud
22:06:00LEAVEAngeL has left.
22:06:01IDLE
22:06:04Cyndi-FOor Lunatics On Line
22:06:07LEAVECharlie-Seashore has left.
22:06:13Gayla-Novitskysometimes the lie is also meaningful
22:06:31Cyndi-FObut not if you don't know parts of the truth Gayla -- so it would seem
22:06:39JOINCharlie-Seashore has joined.
22:06:46Cyndi-FOno...but there are clues you can pick up on
22:06:47Judy-KraybillThanks Cyndi...
22:06:47Stacy-HornWhat does it mean when something someone says shows up italicized?
22:06:56Cyndi-FOonline, you don't even know if they are male or female
22:07:10Riveryou are being whispered to
22:07:11Valerie-HartIsn't what a person perceives more important often than reality?
22:07:11Cyndi-FOperhaps that they are whispering to you?
22:07:14JohnGroholdora-weaver........... And that kind of research takes years to design, implement, and report on...
22:07:20MarthaAinsworthAbsolutely JohnG... it's sort of beside the point!
22:07:27Judy-KraybillStacy: Someone has whispered to you...
22:07:55JohnGroholD-Helton....... Not enough is being done in this area... a bit here and there.
22:08:02Cyndi-FOPeople have faked their own deaths online
22:08:02Gayla-NovitskyCyndi: I'm really speaking outside my own experience here--but there are some papers I've seen about the characters people create in MUD's that don't agree with you!
22:08:02JOINM--Fenichel has joined.
22:08:05Stacy-HornThanks John and Judy!
22:08:18D--Heltonany suggestions JGrohol?
22:08:21dora-weaverJohn; I plan to be around a long time.
22:08:21Mark-Vardelllol@stacy
22:08:22JohnSuler..(the group seems to be flowing now... perhaps we are adapting to this environment?)
22:08:27JohnGroholMarthaAinsworth........... Well, yes, it is to some degree. A therapist isn't a private investigator, nor should they try and be.
22:08:37stormsocial science research in online issues is just starting to look at the effect of projection and transference in text-based relationships
22:08:50SusanOne of the critical techniques I use in the therapeutic relationship is silence...just sitting there with the client. How would that take place or could it take place online?
22:09:18Stacy-HornCyndi, you're talking about places where people are anonymous? Otherwise you know people's gender, etc.
22:09:21StofleSusan... the same way...
22:09:31JohnSuler..or going to the bathroom,right FO?
22:09:33Cyndi-FOsilence online also creates a greater sense of paranoia (sp?)
22:09:35Tom!
22:09:48Stacy-HornSusan, you would have to do therapy online ... differently.
22:09:51Gayla-Novitskyyou have to distinguish between lagging and deliberate silence
22:09:52LorrieCould our resistance be mainly to something new and different?
22:09:53MarthaAinsworth...therapists cost money... why would you waste money lying to them if you are in need of help? well, I guess some people would.
22:09:55Cyndi-FOStacy -- the only way you know MY gender is if you were to call me on the phone this instant. LOL
22:09:57D--Heltonsusan, you could type "silence" or "waiting"
22:09:59JohnGroholD-Helton.......... Not really, these things take time, that's all.
22:10:04Cyndi-FOlol john
22:10:20Mark-Vardelli actually am amazed at the sublties that people pick up in chat tracy *smiles*
22:10:22JohnSulerbye storm!
22:10:22Chat GuyGoodbye, JohnSuler... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:10:54JohnSulerboy, is that ChatGuy dumb...
22:10:54Cyndi-FO(typing "silence" or "waiting" kinda ruins the silent treatment -- I use that same technique dealing with reporters)
22:10:58D--Heltonbye storm
22:10:58Chat GuyGoodbye, D--Helton... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:11:10Gayla-Novitskythe name "Cyndi" gives us a valuable clue to your gender!
22:11:25Cyndi-FOOk..that's different Stacy -- as I said, online in combo with other things is a different matter
22:11:26JohnGroholyes, chat guy is kind of stupid... :-)
22:11:26Chat GuyThe only thing which is really stupid in this world, JohnGrohol, is the word "HOT" on a cup of fast-food coffee.
22:11:26JohnSulerreally, Stacy?...interesting!
22:11:33Cyndi-FOright storm
22:11:34BrainNot necessarily,
22:11:43stormlet's do this again!!!
22:11:46Valerie-HartIt would seem that the traditional methods of "observation" that we learned, especially in an initial session would have to be revised.
22:11:56Cyndi-FOlol chat guy
22:12:00stormthanks John S. by all
22:12:03JohnSulerhe got ya there, John!!
22:12:16LEAVEstorm has left.
22:12:17LEAVEstorm has left.
22:12:21JohnSulerbye storm!!!
22:12:21Chat GuyGoodbye, JohnSuler... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:12:22Gayla-Novitskybye storm!
22:12:22Chat GuyGoodbye, Gayla-Novitsky... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:12:22Billie<smile> you live and learn *wink*
22:12:26JohnGrohol:-) Time for me to be going too... take care all and enjoy the chat.
22:12:39tracy55about silence online...i think it's a great opportunity to explore projection. we encounter ourselves in the silences, with both chat and email.
22:13:04Gayla-NovitskyStacy: I read your book last month, because your community sponsored Yvette Colon
22:13:14Gayla-Novitskygoodbye john
22:13:14Chat GuyGoodbye, Gayla-Novitsky... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:13:30LEAVEJohnGrohol has left.
22:13:44LEAVEM--Fenichel has left.
22:13:49Gayla-NovitskyChat Guy: you cannot get rid of me that easily
22:13:51Mark-Vardellbyee John G ...
22:13:51Chat GuyGoodbye, Mark-Vardell... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:13:58InityI've tired a lot. These refreshings are terrible... O, my eyes :~(
22:14:01dora-weaverlorrie are you talking about the webboard?
22:14:09jansterjohnsuler, lucky it's just a headache and not seizures :)
22:14:10JohnSulerbtw...ChatGuy is a bot
22:14:11BillieChat Guy is a bot...
22:14:16Mark-Vardelllol chat guy
22:14:21LEAVEpam-Richardson has left.
22:14:28Cyndi-FOso I gathered! LOL
22:14:30Lorrieyea the webboard
22:14:30InityA stupid bot, even :))
22:14:30Chat GuyThe only thing which is really stupid in this world, Inity, is the word "HOT" on a cup of fast-food coffee.
22:14:32Billieoops...sorry John
22:14:44Cyndi-FOthe hot cup of coffee through me off...but he's too polite to be real :P
22:14:44Chat GuyThem java beans are goooooood!
22:15:02InityIf I say "stupid", Chat Guy always sends the same comment :)
22:15:02Chat GuyThe only thing which is really stupid in this world, Inity, is the word "HOT" on a cup of fast-food coffee.
22:15:17Stacy-HornStorm! That's just what I discovered and it's part of the reason why I made such an effort to have the ftf element of Echo as strong as the online element. Less paranoia and projection with a strong ftf connection.
22:15:20JohnSulerhe's rather predictable
22:15:20Mark-Vardelllol inity
22:15:21Gayla-Novitskytake care, Martha
22:15:39JohnSulerTOPIC: CAN A BOT DO PSYCHOTHERAPY (!)
22:15:44Cyndi-FOthere is a level of intimacy you can only get via online
22:15:52Cyndi-FOlol john
22:15:56LEAVEJim-Jarvis has left.
22:16:03Gayla-NovitskyCyndi: YES!!!
22:16:03BillieLOL JohnS
22:16:14LEAVEKen-Norton has left.
22:16:16Stacy-HornYes.
22:16:19Cyndi-FObut true therapy (if there is such a thing) requires reading beyond the typed words
22:16:21Tomyes, but it must be called robotherapy
22:16:21jansterjohnsuler, ELIZA seemed to think so :)
22:16:24Joeni-JonesI 've been quietly listening, as I am new here. But I did want to comment about Virtual and chat. It is very different then text only, and I think people respond differently in VR rather then text chat.
22:16:40InityJohnSuler: You mean Elisa? Elisa was good psychotherapist! %)
22:16:43Mark-Vardelllol tom
22:16:44Cyndi-FOOk...I have a favorite scenario to share
22:16:58Cyndi-FOA friend had a horrible relationship with his teenage daughter
22:17:02Mark-Vardellon Pow Wow the robot voice is called Hal
22:17:11Cyndi-FOthey fought all the time, she ran away often
22:17:14JohnSulermy kids play with Eliza all the time... they like to curse at her
22:17:29dora-weaverDo any of you guys use a webboard. You can chat on-line . I use it for classes. Many of my students seem to resist using the board. I don't know why.
22:17:34LEAVED--Helton has left.
22:17:45Cyndi-FOthrough this they managed to go online once
22:17:47LEAVEMarthaAinsworth has left.
22:17:55Joeni-Jones3Dimensional where you put an avatar on much as clothing
22:17:57Stacy-HornPeople metaphorically "turn the machine off" in ftf relationships. They leave the room, don't call for a few days, etc.
22:18:04Mark-Vardellfor the next class i am teaching we are learning to use WebCT dora
22:18:05Cyndi-FOand now when they have BIG issues, they chat online -- that has really helped
22:18:06Gayla-Novitskydora: I'm not familiar with the term..what is a webboard?
22:18:15LEAVEStofle has left.
22:18:36JohnSuleryes.. that's an interesting story, FO...it says a lot about online relationships
22:18:54Gayla-NovitskyJoeni: sounds lovely, but where do you go to do it?
22:18:54Stacy-HornWho is Martha Ainsworth? I recognize that name from somewhere.
22:19:03JohnSulerstudents email me all the time,dora... might it be because a webboard is more public?
22:19:41Gayla-NovitskyStacy: she is the creator of Metanoia
22:19:45Cyndi-FObtw John, Palace was the bonding program for them :D
22:19:50Stacy-HornCyithat's an important point to make. Distance can be a tool.
22:19:56JohnSulercheck the program for the meeting, Stacy http://www.voicenet.com/~suler/bolchat.html
22:20:23JohnSuleras it is for lots of people, FO!
22:20:26Stacy-HornWhat is Metanoia? (If that can be answered easily.)
22:20:26Chat GuyI don't know, but I do know that isn't it.
22:20:52Rivermetanoia is the OPPOSITE of paranoia
22:21:24dora-weaverA webboard letts you set up conferences. You can send post as well as chat. You can also control who comes into the chat room.
22:21:25Gayla-NovitskyStacy: easier to visit & see: www.metanoia.org
22:22:28Cyndi-FOyou think offline (real life) will no longer exist?
22:22:43LEAVEClay-Tucker-Ladd has left.
22:22:54JohnSulerwhat's "real life" FO?
22:23:06Tomwell, someone has to mind the pumps
22:23:06Mark-Vardellbefore i go....my biz url is...http://members.tripod.com/~MarkVardell/index.htm
22:23:11Gayla-NovitskyFO: naww, there'll always be a need for pizza delivery
22:23:12Cyndi-FOreal life meaning offline life
22:23:14Inity%))
22:23:50JohnSulerwhat's "offline life" FO (LOL!)
22:23:53Mark-Vardelland for anyone that has icq....my icq # is 13794588 main icq number
22:24:14InityThere is no life offline. That's an existing. On-Line is LIFE. %) BTW, who have seen the "Net Worth" in Sliders TV series? ;)
22:24:17Gayla-Novitskyhmmmm.....wetware modems installed at birth
22:24:25Cyndi-FOhee hee Mark. Mine is 101299 (sign of a real geek)
22:24:50JohnSulerprobably, Valerie
22:25:06tracy55what about chat though for people who have a body/mind split though or are somewhat dissociated from their bodies and feelings?
22:25:16Gayla-NovitskyValerie: only if they engage an interest of another participant
22:25:21Mark-Vardelllol cyndi swl
22:25:23Brain70's question=what's your sign, 90's question=What's your ICQ number
22:25:30JohnSulerHas anyone tried to do group therapy/counseling with chat?
22:25:34Cyndi-FOlol Brain!!!!!!
22:25:38InityThis "Net-Worth" is about the world divided to on-liners and off-liners...
22:25:48Cyndi-FOIs that BRAIN from Palace?
22:25:48Stacy-HornInteresting question, Tracy.
22:25:50Riverhi ya Brain
22:26:04Valerie-HartTime to go, bye all
22:26:04Chat GuyGoodbye, Valerie-Hart... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:26:06Gayla-Novitskytracy: there are certainly plenty of physically disabled people online
22:26:24Gayla-Novitskybye valerie
22:26:24Chat GuyGoodbye, Gayla-Novitsky... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:26:34Riveronline is a perfect medium for the handicapped
22:26:35Brainyes, shhh, I'm slumming
22:26:58LorrieGayla - How do you know they are physically disabled?
22:27:01Cyndi-FOwelcome brain : )
22:27:06Gayla-NovitskyJohn: I know that there are some who do it
22:27:12tracy55effects of chat depend a lot on the individual. those who hide in words have a great cover here...it reinforces their neurosis....for those who are shy in the outer world, the net is as they say, "the revenge of the introverts"
22:27:14Joeni-Jonesback .. sorry I got dropped by my ISP
22:27:18Riveryou don't..thats why its perfect
22:27:25Billie683082 the sign of a real geek <smile> is mine
22:27:29Cyndi-FOexactly river
22:27:50JohnSulerrevenge of the introverts...funny!
22:27:53Cyndi-FOin fact, I've known two people on line who I later learned were in wheel chairs
22:27:56Gayla-NovitskyLorrie: by report...of course you can have fraud online or offline
22:28:13JohnSulerwelcome back, JJ
22:28:21BrainThe Bible says the meek shall inherit the earth, well as a meek representative, we don't want it
22:28:26Riverthe Net can often act as "training wheels" for people desiring to get over..whatever..and join offline society
22:28:30Cyndi-FOOne told me online gave a new sense of freedom in meeting people
22:28:31Mark-Vardelllol billie thanks would love to add you....liked your comments on the mailing lists :-)
22:28:37InityThe sign of real geek is having an ICQ number? Where is your geek-code, Billie? <g>
22:28:43Cyndi-FOlol brain!!!!
22:28:51Stacy-HornIt's been my experience that *over time* people are the same online as they are in person.
22:28:55Cyndi-FOInity...the sign of a geek is having a really LOW icq number
22:28:57Gayla-NovitskyRight, River
22:29:16dora-weaverlorrie do you have my webboard address? If so give it out.
22:29:20Cyndi-FO(agrees with River)
22:29:42Stacy-HornPeople can't help being themselves. (Over time.)
22:29:56InityCyndi, I don't think so... I think that there are some more important signs of geekiness :)
22:30:00IDLEMichael-Fenichel has left.
22:30:14tracy55john, i've been in an online therapy group using chat. an online therapy group of psychotherapists, no less. it works well only if very structured. when not structured right, someone usually feels deeply hurt or overwhelmed.
22:30:15JohnSulerinteresting... whenever I'm in chat, I feel an urge to "play"
22:30:17Cyndi-FOI don't know Stacy -- I've seen people put up a charade for a long time online
22:30:24Billiethanks Mark
22:30:37Gayla-NovitskyBut Inity, in cyberspace no one can see your pocket protector
22:30:46RiverChat is very Play filled for me
22:30:49JohnSulerinteresting, Tracy... how is it structured?
22:31:11Mark-Vardellno problem billie ....thanks back too
22:31:16tracy55what is it that leads us to be playful and childlike in chat anyway? It so easily is regressive.
22:31:17Stacy-HornIt's true Cyndi, but most people don't. (Not where I go anyway.)
22:31:32JohnSuler(I think we've had a few people leave this meeting because they felt overwhelmed)
22:31:46BillieJohnS ...I feel the same...brings out the play
22:32:06tracy55John, the group I was in was short term for 3 months. The primary structure focused on one person a week, taking turns, and was by mailing list. But we had some chats as well.
22:32:06JohnSulerI think chat requires flexible and strong cognitive filters
22:32:11Tomor underwhelmed
22:32:11BrainIn cyberspace no one can hear you scream, unless you upload it
22:32:31InityGayla-Novitsky : you can see it on my photo on my page... on index :))) http://inity.junik.lv
22:32:35Mark-Vardelli also find cyberplay refreshing in it's own way...think of the level of imagination one gets in touch with
22:32:49Stacy-HornI would think play very useful for therapy. (Again, I am not a therapist.)
22:32:49jansterjohnsuler, i'm finding the refresh business tiring for sure
22:32:50River)scream.wav
22:33:18Tomyes, refresh sucks
22:33:18JohnSulerTom, what do you think about chat?
22:33:32JohnSulerlol, Riv!
22:33:43BrainThere would be a tendancy for people to "read" far too much into a conversation
22:33:53JohnSulerrefresh indeed is annoying
22:33:56Tomohoh...pressure...
22:33:57Cyndi-FOlol brain...you always have a good reply
22:33:58BillieI LOVE the pocket protector
22:33:59Stacy-HornOkay, I'm off! (I can see I am the only tv fan here- I would never have scheduled a chat tonight -- Golden Globe Awards and X Files!)
22:34:09River"read" or project??
22:34:18JohnSulerit really is giving me a headache
22:34:20Jeff-GutermanBye all, gotta go. Thanks JohnS, an interesting experience.
22:34:20Chat GuyGoodbye, Jeff-Guterman... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:34:32JohnSulerbye Stacy!!
22:34:32Chat GuyGoodbye, JohnSuler... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:34:54LEAVEJeff-Guterman has left.
22:34:57RiverYes FO...I think so
22:35:06Brainwell, make assumptions about the other person, since there are usually no visual cues to work with
22:35:21Tomweird..software crashed...
22:35:32Billie404 Not Found
22:35:39JohnSulersee ya, Riv! Thanks for coming
22:35:45Cyndi-FOIs Aski Leaving?
22:36:01Cyndi-FOI'm confused about who is coming and who is going
22:36:08Riverno, I am..See ya FO..et al
22:36:13InityBillie: the GeekGeer http://www.geekgeer.com presenter me two ones for birthday in 1997:)
22:36:20Cyndi-FOlol...ok. bye river : )
22:36:20Chat GuyGoodbye, Cyndi-FO... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:36:21dora-weaverThank John. I gotten some good topics to share with my students. I hope you do this again.
22:36:24Judy-KraybillEnjoyed it...Bye Everyone...
22:36:24Chat GuyGoodbye, Judy-Kraybill... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:36:31JohnSulerI'm still here, FO... ChatGuy says goodbye to you whenever you type "bye"
22:36:31Chat GuyGoodbye, JohnSuler... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:36:39Mark-Vardellbyeee stacy horn...it was nice meeting and i really am looking forward to getting a copy of your book *smiles*
22:36:39Chat GuyGoodbye, Mark-Vardell... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:36:41Tommy software crashed before I answered John's ?...
22:36:41Chat GuyI don't know, but I do know that isn't it.
22:36:43LEAVEJudy-Kraybill has left.
22:36:43RiverHi Ho River...Away
22:36:55dora-weaverHave a good night.
22:36:56LEAVERiver has left.
22:36:58Cyndi-FO(and therein why I dislike bots AND censorship)
22:37:00LEAVEdora-weaver has left.
22:37:11TomI think chat is great...gotta have a purpose for it...have to know what you want...not always easy...
22:37:20LEAVELorrie has left.
22:37:22Mark-Vardellbye judy kraybill
22:37:22Chat GuyGoodbye, Mark-Vardell... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:37:27JOINJudy-Kraybill has joined.
22:37:38Cyndi-FOa lot of PR people seem to be online.
22:37:53Cyndi-FOI think it is because we are used to talking in sound bytes. lol
22:38:00LEAVEJudy-Kraybill has left.
22:38:01IDLEBoar has left.
22:38:01JohnSulerHave you used chat before, Tom?
22:38:10Stacy-HornBye everyone -- to any who whispered to me I'm sorry if I didn't respond. I was confused.
22:38:10Chat GuyGoodbye, Stacy-Horn... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:38:14Inityhttp://inity.junik.lv is alive... i think.
22:38:16LEAVEStacy-Horn has left.
22:38:21Tomyes, a lot...different software....
22:38:22Mark-Vardell*handing chat guy a newspaper*
22:38:49Cyndi-FOlol Mark
22:39:09Tomused to chat on a chess server...focus generally narrowed to those with similar interest
22:39:23Cyndi-FOagreed Brain. But sometimes people feel a need to justify using something ; )
22:39:31Mark-Vardelloic stacy ...i was one that did LOL...thought you thought your were looking for the ignore button lol
22:39:34Gayla-Novitskysorry, tracy
22:39:34JohnSulerdo you think people can establish meaningful relationships in chat ALONE (no email or other kinds of contact)?
22:39:34Chat GuyYou're not alone, JohnSuler! I'm here!
22:39:40Gayla-NovitskyJohnSuler: where/when will transcript of this chat be published?
22:39:46JOINpeter-chechele has joined.
22:40:15JohnSulerGayla... hopefully BOL will put a transcript up on their web site
22:40:21BillieYes JohnS I think so
22:40:21Cyndi-FOJohn -- define what "meaningful" means
22:40:27Tomon one chess server...they saved a guys life calling out the paramedics to online call for help...he found it very meaningful
22:40:28JohnSulerHello Peter
22:40:36peter-chechelesorry I'm so late...thought it was 9:30 PST!
22:40:45Gayla-NovitskyHopefully?
22:40:48Cyndi-FOI would think yes -- much the way people used to develop meaningful relationships via pen pals
22:40:50Brainwell it can certainly develop, but only evolve up to a point
22:40:57JohnSulermeaningful - feeling attached to the other person, emotionally attached
22:41:00Cyndi-FOhi peter! woohoo...another westcoaster!
22:41:03Tomwas in the news
22:41:04jansterjohnsuler, and will the log read backwards like the scroll here? :)
22:41:11Mark-Vardellhello peter
22:41:28Cyndi-FOPeople use to fall in love by only writing -- and hearing from each other once a week or once a month
22:41:39Billiewelcome peter
22:41:51Gayla-NovitskyIt seems that people have preferred modes...some avoid chats, some hate to write e-mails
22:41:51Cyndi-FOso...certainly the same can happen in chat
22:41:58JohnSulerdon't know janster... hopefully they can reverse it!
22:42:00IDLEM-Fenichel has left.
22:42:00tracy55we also need to differentiate chat with strangers from chats with friends we've had online for a while. the possibilities with the latter are much deeper...
22:42:19Mark-Vardellthe first whoooo hooo i heard in here cyndi LOL
22:42:21JohnSulerwhat kind of people like chat over other modes of online communicating?
22:42:22Cyndi-FOyes tracy -- but didn't your online friends begin as strangers?
22:42:39BrainWell, those people didn't get out that much either
22:43:14Tompeople with a lot of time on their hands?
22:43:24Gayla-NovitskyJohn: people who like to listen to others interacting....
22:43:24Cyndi-FOlol Brain
22:43:33Mark-Vardellhmmm one topic no one brought up is the whole thing of flirting and romance or should i say cybersex online
22:43:40Gayla-Novitskypeople who want realtime give-and-take
22:43:46Billieis there a font adjustment here somewhere??
22:43:47tracy55sure cyndi online friends begin as strangers but over time there's more trust and emotional investment, so one is moved more deeply by the communication....
22:43:47peter-checheleI have weekly icq chat sessions with one client...have been for several months now...
22:43:47InityI just think, why people who spend too much time with computers and on the Internet, frequently feel sadness/depression...
22:43:47Chat GuyInity, I'm sorry to hear that...
22:44:18Gayla-Novitskysometimes for the sociability without any interest in flirting type relationships
22:44:22JohnSulerhow is it working, Peter?
22:44:26Cyndi-FOthis is true tracy -- but isn't that also true with "offline" friends?
22:45:21tracy55yes cyndi, i'm not saying there's a difference there. but that the potential for deeper communication and attachment increases also with time...
22:45:26Gayla-NovitskyInity: I think the question is, would they have pleasant interactions with other people if they did not have the computer?
22:45:30Cyndi-FOInity -- do you think people who spend too much time online were depressed to start with?
22:45:30Chat GuyCyndi-FO, what makes you feel so depressed?
22:45:53Cyndi-FOAgreed Tracy
22:45:58peter-checheleIt's interesting...although there is a great deal missing non-verbally, I think we have been able to develop a meaningful relationship over time.
22:46:10Mark-Vardellyes gayla i agree...and family chat rooms that especially holds true
22:46:37JohnSulerPeter..is this someone who also see in-person, or used to see in-person?
22:46:42Billiehummmm I think ChatGuy could do therapy *wink*
22:46:52peter-chechelein fact in some ways a lot more transference and projection happen quicker here then in f2f
22:47:02tracy55But what I find so difficult in online friendships is how people can disappear - completely. Daily communication and then none at all. I've had two online friends I was in touch with daily who lost their online connection and I never heard from the again. People drop each other so easily online.
22:47:04Mark-Vardelllol billie
22:47:06JohnSulerlol, Billie
22:47:07InityI try to understand, what is _first_ - people who tend to fall in depression often go to computers - or, this "computer life" makes people more depressive...
22:47:22peter-checheleno...just one of my online clients...I do both email and chat with her.
22:47:40JohnSuleryes, I could see that happening, Peter - rapid transference
22:47:42Cyndi-FOYes...I've experienced that as well tracy
22:47:52JohnSulerdo you work with the transference?
22:47:56Gayla-NovitskyInity: probably some of both
22:47:59Cyndi-FOhowever, I also have offline friends who suddenly stopped communicating
22:48:05Billiethat Mellon study's results favored the later
22:48:11Cyndi-FOI assume we just grow apart and stop having as much in common
22:48:12InitySometimes I have troubles communicating with people who don't have computers and who don't like them...
22:48:40Gayla-Novitskytracy: yes, it's very true, unless you get some kind of rl contact info. but then sometimes they pop back INTO your life again later
22:48:44BrainI always have to wonder how they set up the parameters for those studies
22:49:02IDLEkathy has left.
22:49:02Mark-VardellJohn Suler it was very interesting and I enjoyed this experience....future ones to come I hope...and have not doubts there will be....thanks you hosted wonderfully *smiles*
22:49:17JohnSulerthanks Mark!
22:49:23Cyndi-FOInity -- the challenge is trying to explain your online friends to your offline friends
22:49:34LEAVEkloe has left.
22:49:36Cyndi-FOgreat to meet you Mark!
22:49:52Billieyes JohnS a job well done in a difficult medium
22:50:11Mark-Vardelland bye to all *waving*......and a big hug for Chat Guy LOL
22:50:11Chat GuyGoodbye, Mark-Vardell... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:50:15peter-checheleNext time gotta get to the party on time!
22:50:16JohnSulerthanks, Billie!
22:50:20InitySome my old friends stopped communicating with me when I bought a computer; they said "so, you're lost, how all these computer people"...
22:50:27Gayla-Novitskybye Mark!
22:50:27Chat GuyGoodbye, Gayla-Novitsky... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:50:36JohnSulertake care, Mark!
22:50:57Billielol Mark....ChatGuy is trying out for my job I think
22:51:02Cyndi-FODid they stop communicating or did you Inity?
22:51:02peter-checheledo the last ones here have to help clean up?
22:51:04LEAVENexxie has left.
22:51:14JOINlynne has joined.
22:51:24InityOne of my good old friends said that online friendship isn't REAL friendship... that my online friends are "artificial", "cybers"...
22:51:30Tom:)
22:51:33Cyndi-FOLynne!!!!
22:51:35Gayla-Novitskywe need to get Chat Guy a flight attendant job, he'd be a natural
22:51:36JohnSuleryes, Peter... you do the dishes...
22:51:41Billieyep peter...::::tossing you the broom and dust pan:::::
22:51:45Mark-Vardellbye gayla ....and cya next peter....and byeeee cyndi and billie *smiles*
22:51:45Chat GuyGoodbye, Mark-Vardell... Have a great day and thanks for stopping by.
22:51:46Cyndi-FOThat is a common myth -- until they experience online friends
22:51:54JohnSulerlol, Gayla!
22:52:13Cyndi-FOwe are all REAL (except for Chat Guy)
22:52:19InityWhen they say "you're lost", "you're outside of society" - it's difficult to see: my old world someday pushed me away...
22:52:26Gayla-NovitskyInity: how do your cyberfriends feel to YOU?
22:52:41JohnSulerChatGuy is real too... a manifestation of the person who programmed him!
22:52:52LEAVEMark-Vardell has left.
22:53:09InityFO, I don't know who stopped first... but anyway I've lost some my old friends who "last offline"...
22:53:13Cyndi-FOnot true john! that is like saying the cartoons on saturday morning are real
22:53:19JohnSulerChatGuy is a kind of "avatar"
22:53:27BrainDo we HAVE to be real ? reality is so overrated
22:53:33jansterjohnsuler, i wouldn't necessarily want to own up to that authorship hehe
22:53:35Billiecorrect JohnS....and some bots are like HAL...and some are like the one on Lost in Space
22:53:36Cyndi-FOhee hee Brain
22:53:41Tomsometimes it feels like online activity bridges the 'inner & outer' in some fresh new way
22:53:42JohnSuleryou mean, cartoons AREN'T real?!
22:53:48Gayla-NovitskyCyndi: you mean they're NOT?
22:53:51InityI like my Internet Friends. And we had some real-life meetings with people whom I
22:53:52Cyndi-FOOk Inity -- I understand. I've overcome some of those problems though
22:53:53JOINcurious has joined.
22:53:58Cyndi-FOlol Gayla!!!!
22:54:13InityI've met online. It was great.
22:54:19JohnSulerwelcome curious!
22:54:24Cyndi-FOYes Inity..same here
22:54:31Billie<---has decided that ChatGuy is a wanna be therapist
22:54:36Cyndi-FOYou know...I discovered ways to bridge the gap though
22:54:49Cyndi-FOMy offline friends now ASK me about some of my online friends...
22:54:51peter-checheleJohn how often do you anticipate having these chats?
22:55:01Cyndi-FOthey've come to know my online friends from stories I've shared
22:55:10Cyndi-FOso...now they feel more included
22:55:14JOINDr-Devon has joined.
22:55:16InityIt's like a rebirthing. An initiation. "I used to have a life, now I have a computer and a modem"... %)
22:55:16JohnSulerdon't know, Peter... you interested in being a speaker?
22:55:19tracy55have any of you experienced online friendships dissolving after you meet f2f? this has happened to me a number of times.
22:55:51Cyndi-FOYes tracy -- but it's only happened to me when there were expectations of romance that didn't pan out
22:55:52JohnSuleryes, tracy...
22:55:58Gayla-NovitskyTracy: no, though I have heard of that
22:55:59Billielol JohnS and yes cartoons are real...but define 'real' *wink*
22:56:24Cyndi-FOlol Inity...try and find ways to bring your friends into the loop of your cyber friends maybe
22:56:26peter-chechelewhoa....not sure I'm an authority yet! I do have experiences and thoughts on the topic but elevating me to "a speaker" kinda intimidates me.
22:56:42Billiegreetings DrD
22:56:49JohnSulerLOL...ok, Peter
22:56:50jansteri've done the opposite of the norm: brought people from real life (friends and relatives) who live far away onto IRC to chat and save phone bills
22:56:54BrainThe trick with that, is to have no expectations, so you never can be disappointed
22:57:04Cyndi-FOright..I've done that as well janster
22:57:17Cyndi-FOright Brain. But that's the problem. It's a trick.
22:57:17Dr-Devonhello :)
22:57:30Cyndi-FOHow does one achieve "no expectations" when you've been intimate online?
22:57:37Cyndi-FOhi Devon!
22:57:50peter-chechelewho else here is doing some sort of online work?
22:57:53Tomhaving no expectations is a little like running out of air...isn't it?
22:57:54InityI'm like a drug-dealer: many my friends joined the Internet too when I
22:58:04JohnSulerdid anyone ever have an online relationship that blew up due to distortions in how the other person perceived you?
22:58:15Cyndi-FOby intimate, I don't mean cyber, but becoming closely attached
22:58:24Inityed them it's beauty. An Internet ambassador, like someone called me a year ago...
22:58:24Chat GuyInity, I'm sorry to hear that...
22:58:28Billie<---is considering starting....
22:58:36JohnSulerI am, Peter... but it's more of a "community psychology" approach
22:58:38BrainIt can be done, if you keep emotions in check
22:58:50Cyndi-FOahh...ok Inity....I understand
22:59:04Cyndi-FOIt's hard to keep emotions in-check
22:59:07Gayla-Novitskygee, Inity, that's pretty neat
22:59:17jansterpeter, what do you mean by "online work"?
22:59:17Cyndi-FOin fact, I find it much more difficult to keep them in check online than off
22:59:23tracy55i've had online friendships dissolve not because of expectations or disappointed romance, but because the mystique was gone....as if cyberspace created a kind of container for a certain kind of communication that was then lost.
22:59:28Billie<--I've had some people shy away when they discovered my profession
22:59:37Inity%)
22:59:43BrainI never said it would be easy
22:59:47Cyndi-FOhmmm...now that I haven't experienced tracy
22:59:52JohnSulerinteresting, tracy
22:59:52peter-checheleic...would really like to chat with others who are actively involved in the delivery of 1to1 internet based therapy.
22:59:58Cyndi-FOmost of my friendships were bonded even more by meeting
23:00:08Dr-DevonI don't think you can "achieve" no expectations, you have to go in without any
23:00:26JohnSulerPeter, do you belong to ISMHO?
23:00:49peter-checheleyes john...remember Chevy's???
23:00:57peter-checheleRider University???
23:01:03JohnSuleroy... of course! Sorry!
23:01:17JohnSulerhave you connected with ISMHO people since then?
23:01:31Billie<smile> and tosses JohnS a memory cookie
23:01:52peter-checheleno problem...such the problem of text based/non-visual mediums.
23:01:55JohnSuler(the brain is going)
23:02:09Gayla-NovitskyNow there's a case in point: ISMHO making a point of meeting in RL
23:02:15Cyndi-FOyour brain or Brain brain?
23:02:17peter-chechelenot really just listen in to the list posts
23:02:21tracy55john, i know a man who was devastated to discover a woman he was "intimate" with online was a 50 lbs overweight. she had sent him a picture from when she was thin. He was crushed for months after they met, couldn't even be friends anymore.
23:02:31JohnSulerMY brain
23:02:41Cyndi-FOthat is unfortunate tracy
23:02:45Cyndi-FOlol john
23:03:20tracy55yes cyndy it is always sad to see people rejected based on physical appearance issues
23:03:20Chat Guytracy55, I'm sorry to hear that...
23:03:21Cyndi-FOit's unfortunate she didn't have faith in herself and unfortunate he felt the relationship required a thin friend
23:03:29peter-checheledoes anyone here do groups online??? I would love to co-facilitate one if we could ever get it off the ground.
23:03:34BrainI would let you know if I was going
23:03:54JohnSulerchat group, Peter?
23:04:03JohnSuleror email group?
23:04:04Cyndi-FOhee hee...ok Brain : )
23:04:12Billietracy55 ...many such stories exist but no different than the ones from ordinary life where one of the two say "i'm single" but they are married
23:04:12Gayla-NovitskyPeter: I would definitely like to participate if you do!!!
23:04:35Cyndi-FOit's much easier to hide a marriage online than off, though
23:04:44peter-checheleyes a chat group...but not sure how to go about setting it up
23:05:13Tomgood night to all, thanks John, look forward to the next one.
23:05:15peter-checheleand concerned about how to control flaming...
23:05:23BillieI would also be interested peter
23:05:29JohnSulerspeak to Grohol... he knows a lot about it
23:05:34LEAVETom has left.
23:05:38JohnSulergood night tom!
23:05:46Gayla-NovitskyPeter: limited membership probably
23:06:11peter-chechelei'm sure he does...he seems to be into everything.
23:06:19Cyndi-FOcan they assign the co-leader administrative functions to mute or remove people?
23:06:24JohnSuleralso speak to Gil Levin... it's possible BOL might help you get it running
23:06:26Billieand perhaps a bit of flaming is not in need of control
23:06:49Cyndi-FOFlame, baste and broil : )
23:06:50peter-chechelewell I'll do that and Gayla and Billie let's keep in touch
23:07:11peter-chechelewhat or who is BOL
23:07:26Gayla-NovitskyCyndi: online BBQ sauce
23:07:28tracy55btw, the community i'm obsessively involved with is http://www.ancientsites.com/ study of ancient civilizations we just did a weekend of chats on women in history. learning-based but strong friendships form. Highly recommended.
23:07:29JohnSulerit would be an interesting topic to focus on in a chat meeting like this one, peter
23:07:38Gayla-NovitskyBehavior OnLine, Peter
23:07:43Billieplease peter...my e-mail is angeldoc@home.com
23:07:54peter-checheleohhh how silly of me
23:08:07Billiethe site your on now peter is MHN/BOL
23:08:12InityI love ancient history, especially Egypt, but I don't want to join ancientcities community...
23:08:17JohnSulerBehavior Online is sponsoring this meeting
23:08:30Gayla-NovitskyPeter, I am at frogette75@hotmail.com
23:08:38Cyndi-FOthanks tracy
23:08:48Brainsince, I have to teach ancient history, I need to keep it separate
23:08:50Cyndi-FOJohn -- one thing I've learned with running chat programs
23:08:55tracy55inity, we can only join so many communities, right? got to set limits....
23:09:06Cyndi-FOIt's sometimes easier to break a huge topic down into smaller pieces
23:09:16JohnSulerPeter, let me know if you want to help organize a meeting like this one devoted specifically to chat therapy
23:09:25Cyndi-FOand then run a series of discussions -- each week tackling a little different question or aspect
23:09:27InityWhat does 'sponsoring this meeting mean?
23:09:40JohnSulerYes, I tried, FO.. but with not much success!
23:10:00JohnSuleroh.. I see what you mean, FO... yes, that's a plan!
23:10:02Cyndi-FOWas it open like this?
23:10:19InityIn ancientcities there are too many people... and it's like a RPG...
23:10:19JohnSulerwe're on the BOL web site, Inity
23:10:23Cyndi-FOright -- so invite this group back over a 6 week period or so
23:10:39peter-checheletrying to copy and paste your emails...is there a short way of doing this?
23:10:44Cyndi-FOwe won't all make it, but I'm sure many would make an effort to attend most sessions
23:11:09Billie<--afk BBiaB
23:11:12JohnSulerhave everyone click on your name, Peter, and send you an email
23:11:33Gayla-Novitskyalt-edit
23:11:49Billieyes peter give me yours and I will send you a test and then you can add me to your addy book
23:12:35Cyndi-FOnight John!
23:12:36LEAVElynne has left.
23:12:36JohnSulerthank you for coming!
23:13:01Gayla-Novitskygoodnight, John, and thanks
23:13:02jansternight, john, thanks for the meeting !
23:13:06Cyndi-FOthanks for inviting us!
23:13:13LEAVEJohnSuler has left.
| Chat Events |